I won't criticize you for thinking about this, because I believe this is the kind of question serious writers ponder. There's no right answer, but that doesn't mean it's a bad question.
John Gardner deliberately set out to write his masterful Mikkelson's Ghosts with chapters around 30 pages each, to create, as he put it, "a dense, elephantine rhythm."
That expectation and rate of flow can be important. But so can deviating from it. TrickyFiction mentions Douglas Adams as someone who varies chapter length unexpectedly, and it's a good point. Adams did vary--and I believe he did that with full deliberation (and a grin).
In William Faulkner's tour-de-force novel As I Lay Dying (which has, if I recall, 15 different first-person POVs), he has one chapter I believe I can quote from memory:
My mother is a fish.
How many whole chapters can you quote? That's the only one I know by heart. But he perpetrated that chapter (which in context has surprising emotional force) in full awareness of what he was doing.
Short chapters in a book filled with longer chapters will be quite jarring. But that doesn't mean they are wrong.
This is a bad thing to get obsessed with. But it's a good thing to think about. Bravo!