"Hi," John said -or- "Hi," said John?

Status
Not open for further replies.

WannabeWriter

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
323
Reaction score
14
"<NAME> said" or "said <NAME>"

I notice two ways of identifying speakers in dialogue.

1. "I ran out," Kevin said.
2. "I ran out," said Kevin.

Are there pros and cons of either usage?
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,159
Location
The right earlobe of North America
The latter sounds old-fashioned to me, generally, although there might be context in which it would work appropriately. But if it's a question that really bugs you, go to a library or bookstore and see what other authors do in books similar to yours.

caw
 

ORION

Sailed away years ago
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 25, 2006
Messages
1,996
Reaction score
348
Location
Hawaii
Website
patriciawoodauthor.com
I agree - read more -- each has its use. You can also make attributions ahead of the sentence depending on what your intent is.
 

reenkam

aka cupcake
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 5, 2007
Messages
19,092
Reaction score
4,059
Personally, I use both and switch back and forth depending on which flows better in the sentence.
 

plunderpuss

Patron Saint of Sarcasm
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 14, 2007
Messages
383
Reaction score
107
Location
PNW
Website
inkshark.net
I'm with reenkam. It has to do with flow, so it's a choice every time I write it.
 

JJ Cooper

.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,511
Reaction score
1,247
Location
On a big Island
Disagree with a couple of posters here. I think you should select one and keep it consistent throughout your work. I advise against swapping back and forth, as it can be distracting.

Personally - Name said.
 

seun

Horror Man
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 3, 2006
Messages
9,709
Reaction score
2,054
Age
48
Location
uk
Website
www.lukewalkerwriter.com
Disagree with a couple of posters here. I think you should select one and keep it consistent throughout your work. I advise against swapping back and forth, as it can be distracting.

Personally - Name said.

Agreed on all points.
 

Danalynn

NEVER give up!!!!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
861
Reaction score
118
Age
55
Location
Troy, Ohio
Nowadays, it seems to be more modern to use Name said. I agree that the other one seems old fashioned. I've also read where it's taboo now to switch back and forth from Name said to said Name throughout a novel. It can take the reader out of the story and make them notice that they are reading, and that's the LAST thing you want to happen.
:gone:

Either way you prefer to use it, though, consistency is the KEY. Pick whichever of the two that you like the most, and stick with it throughout the entire novel. Your readers will thank you for it.

;)
 

Marlys

Resist. Love. Go outside.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
3,584
Reaction score
981
Location
midwest
I disagree with the "pick one and stick to it" crowd. While I tend to use "Name said" most of the time, there are instances where for flow or emphasis "said Name" is the better choice. Consider:

"Poor lad," the man who hadn't wanted to help me earlier said.
"Poor lad," said the man who hadn't wanted to help me earlier. [too much going on between subject and verb in the first example]

"I think we're all peasants at heart," the King of France said.
"I think we're all peasants at heart," said the King of France. [the punchline effect is lost in the "Name said" example]

Just out of curiosity: taboo according to what source?
 

johnzakour

Dangerous with a Keyboard
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2006
Messages
1,939
Reaction score
263
Website
www.johnzakour.com
I am with the "said <name>" is old more old fashion crowd. (Or perhaps younger sounding.)

I'm also with the mix it up a bit crowd. I usually use "<name> said" but on occasion when it fits I will change it around. Nothing is taboo if you do it right.
 

scribbler1382

Write For You, Edit For The Reader
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 10, 2005
Messages
1,429
Reaction score
161
Location
Toronto
Website
www.soderstrom.ca
Mix it up. But don't get hung up on stuff like this. For the most part, as long as you stay away from swifties, attributions are invisible to the reader.
 

hammerklavier

It was a dark and stormy night
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
711
Reaction score
85
Location
NC
It seems 'Name said' is overwhelmingly what most people use in common speach.
 

Charlie Horse

Speaking in metaphors
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 30, 2007
Messages
1,793
Reaction score
232
Location
Grumpyville
Website
imablogginghorse.blogspot.com
This is like asking whether you should wear button fly or zip ups. I say whichever is more comfortable for you. I do agree that you should be somewhat consistent throughout, but even on that point I don't think you need to obsess about it.
 

IceCreamEmpress

Hapless Virago
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Messages
6,449
Reaction score
1,321
I disagree with the "pick one and stick to it" crowd. While I tend to use "Name said" most of the time, there are instances where for flow or emphasis "said Name" is the better choice. Consider:

"Poor lad," the man who hadn't wanted to help me earlier said.
"Poor lad," said the man who hadn't wanted to help me earlier. [too much going on between subject and verb in the first example]

"I think we're all peasants at heart," the King of France said.
"I think we're all peasants at heart," said the King of France. [the punchline effect is lost in the "Name said" example]

Just out of curiosity: taboo according to what source?

This is the right answer, in my opinion.

I don't think "Said she" or "Said he" are useful except in a book that's trying to give the flavor of a bygone age.

But "...said the man behind the counter" is always useful.
 

LilliCray

Plot? What plot?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
728
Reaction score
179
Location
Coping
Website
mutteringsofascribe.blogspot.com
I always use "Name said." Something about "said Name" jolts me as both a reader and a writer out of whatever piece I'm reading/working on. Not that I'm... y'know... weird or anything. *hides*
 

johnzakour

Dangerous with a Keyboard
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2006
Messages
1,939
Reaction score
263
Website
www.johnzakour.com
I always use "Name said." Something about "said Name" jolts me as both a reader and a writer out of whatever piece I'm reading/working on. Not that I'm... y'know... weird or anything. *hides*

There are times when a little jolt is good. Like I said, most of the time I do go with <Name> said... But on occasion when it seems right I will do a switch.
 

reenkam

aka cupcake
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 5, 2007
Messages
19,092
Reaction score
4,059
I just picked up a couple books and 4 of the 5 used both "said Name" and "Name said". So, it seems, either my books are anomalies, people don't like reading the books I read, or people actually don't notice when an author makes the switch...which should actually be the case, in my opinion.
 

IceCreamEmpress

Hapless Virago
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Messages
6,449
Reaction score
1,321
I agree, but I think the original poster was looking for specific guidance on "Kevin said" vs "said Kevin." type tags.

Oh, agreed.

It's just that some people take rules and guidelines to an extreme. After the various "you must NEVER use an adverb" and "you must NEVER use passive construction" comments I've seen, I would hate for someone to take away "you must NEVER use 'said {someone}'" from this thread.
 

MerryDay

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
549
Reaction score
98
Location
Waco, TX
Website
evemarieperry.com
Well, if you need one more counter-opinion, I'm in the said Kevin camp. I think the whole point of using said as a dialogue tag is so that it's "invisible" to the reader. Personally, when the construction is inversed to Kevin said it doesn't have the same effect on me - I notice it, it doesn't always flow right, technically this messes up the punctuation of the sentence, etc.

And I'm all for switching it up a few times, if you find your syntax getting a little redundant. However, whichever you choose, it's best to only switch it up when you want your dialogue tag not to be "invisible." For a jolt, as it were.
 

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,767
Reaction score
4,662
Location
Scotland
If 'said X' is good enough for Philip Pullman it's good enough for me and I can honestly say I never cared a toss which way it was written in any book I can recall reading.

And I had to check Pullman's novels to be sure which version he used.
 
Last edited:

IceCreamEmpress

Hapless Virago
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Messages
6,449
Reaction score
1,321
Well, if you need one more counter-opinion, I'm in the said Kevin camp. I think the whole point of using said as a dialogue tag is so that it's "invisible" to the reader. Personally, when the construction is inversed to Kevin said it doesn't have the same effect on me - I notice it

I think that your response is pretty unusual. Most people find "Kevin said" less noticeable than "said Kevin".

How about at the beginning of a sentence? "Said X" at the beginning of a sentence really sticks out to me, unless it's in an historical novel. (Or a poem :) )
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.