first sack of Troy and Heracles

Status
Not open for further replies.

blackpen

Bizzare in Berkeley
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 8, 2007
Messages
177
Reaction score
10
Location
california
I'm not sure if I am posting this in the right section, but I'll give it a shot.

I read that Troy was sacked twice. I know that the second time corresponds to Troy VIIa, but is the first time supposed to be Troy V? I thought Troy V was supposed to have been destroyed by an earthquake? Also, according to mythology, was the first sack of Troy when Heracles killed Laomedon and put Priam on the throne?

I'm trying to construct my own timeline of the events that happen in Greek mythology and am very confused. I also want to accommodate any archaeological records that support it.

This is the timeline that is confusing me: http://members.aol.com/JFZeigler/heroline.htm
According to this version, Heracles finishes his 12 labors in 1267. Then he dies in 1246. Then in 1235, Theseus goes to the underworld to kidnap Persephone. At this time, Heracles should be coming along to perform his 12th labor and get Cerberus, but according to this timeline, Heracles is already dead. ??!!

I was under the assumption that Heracles had had all his adventures and finished his labors before he died and became a god. Am I right or am I missing something? Thanks!!
 

Doogs

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
1,047
Reaction score
213
Location
Austin, TX
Website
doogs.wordpress.com
Sounds to me like you are trying to work out definitive fact where there is only assumption and conjecture (and let's not forget this is mythology, not recorded history).

I think the author of that timeline you posted put it very well:

The surprising thing about the ancient Greek myths is not that they are so consistent. The miracle is that one can build a coherent timeline out of them at all. Each city had its own cycle of myths, intended to glorify local heroes and cast those of other cities into the shade. When it came time to compile the stories, the mythographers didn't make much effort to force the stories into mutual consistency.

I'd suggest reading their assumptions, seeing where you agree/disagree with their thinking, and building your own timeline as you proceed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.