Last royal to die in combat?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zelenka

Going home!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Messages
2,921
Reaction score
488
Age
46
Location
Prague now, Glasgow in November
(I posted here rather than story research but if that's the wrong place, I apologise).

Does anyone know who was the last member of the British royal family to die in combat? As opposed to the last monarch. This came up in a discussion at work and the only stipulations are that it should be someone fairly close to the throne, as in crowned prince, second son or thereabouts, and they had to die in actual combat on the battlefield (as opposed to say some incident at home related to a conflict, for instance).

I suppose it is cheating a little to ask here, but I would imagine the rest of them are all off cheating elsewhere. Anyway, rep points for anyone who knows!
 

waylander

Who's going for a beer?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2005
Messages
9,768
Reaction score
2,421
Age
67
Location
London, UK
My initial thought is that you have to go all the way back the the Wars of the Roses to find one.
There was a Royal Duke killed in an aircrash in 1942, but that was an accident not combat.
 

dpaterso

Also in our Discord and IRC chat channels
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
18,805
Reaction score
4,600
Location
Caledonia
Website
derekpaterson.net
I'd have been inclined to answer Lord Louis Mountbatten if I hadn't seen your "at home" stipulation...

One of Queen Victoria's grandsons was killed in France during WWI, damned if I can remember who, and wading through the usual million random web pages that list whenever you try to find something useful doesn't seem like a productive way to spend the morning. :)

...of course, having said that, up pops this:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/02/29/nharry629.xml

Prince George, Duke of Kent, the brother of King George VI, joined the RAF during the Second World War and was killed in 1942 when his flying boat crashed.

During the First World War, Prince Maurice of Battenberg, a grandson of Queen Victoria, was also killed in action.

He died near Mons in October 1914 during the First Battle of Ypres. He was 23.
Depends if you class the poor blighter as a "Royal" or not.

-Derek
 

pdr

Banned
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
4,259
Reaction score
832
Location
Home - but for how long?
I have no resources to back this up...

but wasn't it Queen Victoria's daughter Beatrice, who lost her husband, Prince ??? from Germany in battle? Boer war I think.
 

waylander

Who's going for a beer?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2005
Messages
9,768
Reaction score
2,421
Age
67
Location
London, UK
but wasn't it Queen Victoria's daughter Beatrice, who lost her husband, Prince ??? from Germany in battle? Boer war I think.

Prince Henry of Battenburg - died of malaria in 1896 during the Anglo-Asante War

So no, not a death in combat
 

Zelenka

Going home!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Messages
2,921
Reaction score
488
Age
46
Location
Prague now, Glasgow in November
I'd have been inclined to answer Lord Louis Mountbatten if I hadn't seen your "at home" stipulation...

One of Queen Victoria's grandsons was killed in France during WWI, damned if I can remember who, and wading through the usual million random web pages that list whenever you try to find something useful doesn't seem like a productive way to spend the morning. :)

...of course, having said that, up pops this:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/02/29/nharry629.xml


Depends if you class the poor blighter as a "Royal" or not.

-Derek

Derek - I've put down Prince George as my answer as I think that counts as 'Royal' enough. Just have to see what my colleagues come up with! (I said Mountbatten when we were discussing what was or wasn't allowed, as that was the first answer I thought of, but they said no.)

I've noted the other answers in case they decide not to accept that one. Besides which, I found it an interesting question anyway and so the answers were great.

Jess
 

waylander

Who's going for a beer?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2005
Messages
9,768
Reaction score
2,421
Age
67
Location
London, UK
Frederick Augustus and Charles Philip - younger brothers of George I killed in 1690 fighting the Turks
Christian - another younger brother of George I drowned in the Danube while fighting the French in 1703

Difficulty with these is that when they died George was not King of England, so it is a matter of interpretation whether they are part of the English Royal Family.
 

IceCreamEmpress

Hapless Virago
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Messages
6,449
Reaction score
1,321
Derek - I've put down Prince George as my answer as I think that counts as 'Royal' enough.

Legally, the monarch's siblings are included in the Royal Family. This is why there was so much brouhaha about Princess Margaret's wish to marry Group Captain Townsend, a--gasp!--divorced man.
 

Zelenka

Going home!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 1, 2007
Messages
2,921
Reaction score
488
Age
46
Location
Prague now, Glasgow in November
Legally, the monarch's siblings are included in the Royal Family. This is why there was so much brouhaha about Princess Margaret's wish to marry Group Captain Townsend, a--gasp!--divorced man.

I know, what I meant was 'royal enough' for my colleague. His exact stipulation was 'pretty close to the king or queen family-wise', so I think that qualifies. The question covered any official member of the royal family, really, but he wanted someone close.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.