- Joined
- Jul 11, 2007
- Messages
- 392
- Reaction score
- 175
when i decided i was going to be a writer, i wrote a bad novel. i finished it (thinking at the time that it was brilliant), edited it (clumsily), and sent it out. i was then introduced, by way of inundation, to rejection. eventually, a quality san fran editor looked at it. he "passed it around the office" but decided to turn it down. at the time, his reasons for passing seemed too integral to the story to correct it, too much work. i haven't touched it since (4 yrs.) and have been happy writing new stuff and refining my voice.
recently, i've been tempted to lay the body back out on the examination table, but my better judgment tells me to leave it in the ground. i am fine with the idea that it was an educational first novel that is never to be published, but there are some golden scenes, wild story lines and 3-d characters i hate to relinquish to oblivion.
so, if you've got this manuscript that you wouldn't enjoy picking through again, and you know you'd have to rewrite 40-60 percent or more, would you do it, or just keep pressing forward on new work with what you've gleaned?
recently, i've been tempted to lay the body back out on the examination table, but my better judgment tells me to leave it in the ground. i am fine with the idea that it was an educational first novel that is never to be published, but there are some golden scenes, wild story lines and 3-d characters i hate to relinquish to oblivion.
so, if you've got this manuscript that you wouldn't enjoy picking through again, and you know you'd have to rewrite 40-60 percent or more, would you do it, or just keep pressing forward on new work with what you've gleaned?
Last edited: