My whole take on Harry Potter is that Rowling was trying to recapture the glory days of Pre-WW II Britain and present it in a palatable manner to today's generation of British children.
-- the old locomotive trains
-- dragons
-- wizards
-- boarding schools
-- uniforms
-- decorum
-- ancient traditions
-- respect for one's edlers
-- respect for the past
-- the old suitcases
-- the old automobiles
-- fountain pens and/or quill pens
-- castles
-- witches
That laundry list represents some of the most treasured aspects of their history and their cultural identity--some of which are gone forever, or at the very least have been devalued and striped of a former dignity. They were all once important elements of what it once meant to be British. Today's generation of British (and American) children don't know about any of that except what they might glean passingly from books and old movies, and maybe the musings/grumblings of old people that they might come in contact with.
The whole Harry Potter series celebrates that and makes kids just marvel about it. J K Rowling is holding up those old traditions for the eyes of British children, and asking them to be proud of their past. AND she's asking them to emmulate the same degree of dignity and the respect toward authority and tradition that children of yesteryear employed.
One of the bitter and angry struggles Rowling had with Warner Brothers when they were in the early stages of developing the first film was her unbudging insistance that not one American actor was to be cast in any of the roles, most especially not the children's roles. That's because British people have for decades now seen so very many of their most beloved stories hijacked by American film studios and Americanized ("Winnie the Pooh" is a classic example. And look at Elijah Wood playing Frodo, and Sean Astin playing Sam). Their culture is being siphoned away from them via American cinema -- robbed from them. She wanted only British children playing those British roles for the sake of the millions of British children who would be greatly encouraged to see one of their own up on the screen for a change. In her mind, this story firmly belongs to the cultural identy of Britain and needs to stay there, even in its film versions.
Christians are focusing on the wrong issue here in the HP series of books and movies. They're up in arms over the magic and witchcraft. But they're overlooking the respect toward others and the dignity toward self and the reverence of tradition that the children in those stories exhibit.
not sure about a lot of this. I agree with the last paragraph, but the rest? Most British Children never went to Boarding School, Britain between the Wars was a pretty difficult place - the Depression was bad here too, btw. Old suitcases?
Old cars? There is a Ford Anglia in HP and that is about it.
Steam trains - absolutely
Pens - well yeas...
Witchcraft - remember we were always far less hung up on this than Americans were generally - still goes on, mind.
Ancient traditions - yep
castles - check
respect for the past - yep
respect for elders - check
decorum - we still queue well, you know, but point taken, although most of the behaviour of the kids in HP is pretty undecorous
wizards - never had any of those for real
dragons - as above, although the welsh probably still think theirs was real... (bless)
uniforms - most british schoolkids wear uniform still
Tolkien did this better in creating his myth for Britian... did it pretty well, I think. I do not think HP will last as well, somehow.
I wonder how those Christians who railed at HP feel now he has been revealed as a Christ-like figure in the last book... your thoughts on this would be gratefully recieved.