James, do you think then it's better just to stay away from smaller contests??? as an editor, would you rather see work that hasn't been in a contest at all?
sigh...so much to learn. blah.
If it's one of the few good contests out thee, I'm all for the writer entering it, and I want to know if the story wins, places, or shows. Anything in the top three.
It doesn't matter to me whether a writer enters small contests, it's simply that even winning one usually doesn't mean a thing. A contest is only as good as the judges it has, and by the prestige it has. Far too many contests are run by people or groups or fly by night magazines with no qualifications at all for judging fiction. A writer who enters such contests is wasting time and money. You wouldn't believe how bad some of the winners are.
But there are a few good contests out there. Not many for each genre, but a few, and placing in the top three in such a contest will at least make an editor read the story personally, rather than having an assistant editor read it.
The thing is this; a story good enough to win, place, or show in a legitimate contest is probably good enough to sell anyway, so you don't need the contest. So unless it's a high profile contest with good prize money, judges with names you recognize, and is sponsored by a prestigious magazine or group, I do think it's better to skip contests and just submit the stories to magazines.