AFI's new top 100 American films??

gp101

gp101

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
246
Location
New England
Did anyone watch the show last night? I didn't know it was happening but caught the list on their website. I'm more disappointed with this list than I was with their original list a decade ago.

Casablanca--my personal number one--dropped from second to third; no big deal. But what's with all the musicals? Are people really that enamored with them today? Quite a few placed higher than Pulp Fiction which I think dropped considerably. To me, Pulp is our generation's Citizen Kane and chould be in the top ten. And Titanic (not included in the original because it was released the same year as the list), is listed as 80-something, I think. Doesn't seem right.

Star Wars, not in top ten... does that seem right? Raging Bull as number 4? Isn't that a bit high? I dunno... it's all subjective, but I figured the top twenty would be controversial in that the order would be debated by a spot or two, not by measures of 30 or 40 spots.
 
Plot Device

Plot Device

A woman said to write like a man.
Registered
Joined
Apr 14, 2007
Messages
11,976
Reaction score
1,880
Location
Next to the dirigible docking station
Website
sandwichboardroom.blogspot.com
Thanks, dpat. This list from your second link is very helpful. :)

AFI asks jurors to consider the following criteria in their selection process:

  1. Feature-Length Fiction Film: Narrative format, typically over 60 minutes in length.
  2. American Film: Motion picture with significant creative and/or production elements from the United States.
  3. Critical Recognition: Formal commendation in print, television and digital media.
  4. Major Award Winner: Recognition from competitive events including awards from peer groups, critics, guilds and major film festivals.
  5. Popularity Over Time: Including success at the box office, television and cable airings, and DVD/VHS sales and rentals.
  6. Historical Significance: A film's mark on the history of the moving image through visionary narrative devices, technical innovation or other groundbreaking achievements.
  7. Cultural Impact: A film's mark on American society in matters of style and substance.
  8. AFI also allowed five write-in votes per ballot.
Click to expand...

Of these eight criteria, it can be argued that about half of them are capable of being objectively measured in a quanitative fashion. So I think those objective criteria need to be given their own lists where all 100 of these films are ranked from highest to lowest.

Such as, #5 is perhaps the most objective and quanitfiable. But also, #2, #3, #4, and #6 could also be quantified via actual examples. So trying to achieve a graded numeric weighting for each film is not out of the question here. And #7 might also be quantifiable to some degree.
 
bison

bison

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 28, 2005
Messages
162
Reaction score
15
Location
San Antonio,Texas
Top 100 Movies

Did you catch the rankings for the top 100 movies of all time?
Citizen Kane (what a movie) was first.
I wish Hollywood would get back to producing quality instead of boom-boom, blow 'em up movies. Either that or sick comedy.
What does that say about our society and our values as a people?
 

jonpiper

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 27, 2006
Messages
536
Reaction score
19
Location
San Fernando Valley
It's interesting that some films on the 1998 list fell off and otheres came on. Some older films fell off while some pre 1990 films were voted on the list. Also a few films advanced way up on the list while others fell down in the rankings.

Just illustrates the subjective nature of film and the criteria for a truly great film. However the top three remained, but God Father jumped ahead of Casablanca for secon.
 
dpaterso

dpaterso

Also in our Discord and IRC chat channels
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
18,805
Reaction score
4,600
Location
Caledonia
Website
derekpaterson.net
I merged the two similar threads. Posts are automatically sorted by date/time.

-Derek
 

squalid

Registered
Joined
Jul 4, 2005
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Location
on an island
Can one of you explain to me why a list of films (or any list) considered to be the best films of all time by very biased self-promoters is so important? After all this is no more than a profitable marketing campaign.
I really would like to understand why it's so important to be told what's good and what's not and then wonder why your favorite movie is no longer where it was the year before?

If it's to promote discussion, fine, but why not discuss the merits of the screenplay or original novels and how they were adapted?

consumed by squalid curiosity
 
Plot Device

Plot Device

A woman said to write like a man.
Registered
Joined
Apr 14, 2007
Messages
11,976
Reaction score
1,880
Location
Next to the dirigible docking station
Website
sandwichboardroom.blogspot.com
I don't think it's a profitable marketing campaign. It's the AFI. They have an interest in promoting excellence in cinema. And therefore some sort of a measure or a standard of excellence needs to be held up for everyone to see and learn from. Thus the need of such a list.

As vile and corrupt as this industry is, it's still an art form, and excellence in art needs to be trumpeted. And the AFI does what they can to try and set some standards for the artistic aspect of it.
 
gp101

gp101

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
246
Location
New England
squalid said:
Can one of you explain to me why a list of films (or any list) considered to be the best films of all time by very biased self-promoters is so important? After all this is no more than a profitable marketing campaign.
I really would like to understand why it's so important to be told what's good and what's not and then wonder why your favorite movie is no longer where it was the year before?

If it's to promote discussion, fine, but why not discuss the merits of the screenplay or original novels and how they were adapted?

consumed by squalid curiosity
Click to expand...


I think we like lists as a society. VH1 virtually makes a living with lists, most of them silly, occupying air space. They wouldn't be doing so if people weren't watching.

I'm no psychologist but I'm willing to bet most of us want our own lists in our heads somewhaat validated by the official AFI list. And of course, It's fun to argue. This is why some sports programs on radio are so popular... when they're not analyzing the game or the trade, they're debating the best baseball player, biggest boxing moment, greatest TD. We all have our opinions and for some silly reason, when it comes to pop culture, we like them voiced.

Too bad we weren't as vocal on a whole when it came to elections.
 
gp101

gp101

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
246
Location
New England
I'd like to see a top 50 greatest foreign films list. Cinema Paradiso and M would be my tops. Das Boot and Metropolis would be up there. A couple of Kurosawa and a couple of Fellini pics. Eisenstein. A whole lot of recent Italian and Spanish flix.

Would Eastwood's spaghetti westerns make it in such a category? May as well. It's sacriledge that not one of them made it to AFI's top 100. Come to think of it, I don't think any of Clint's films made it.

Those people are stupid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.