- Joined
- Sep 1, 2006
- Messages
- 4,302
- Reaction score
- 414
I was looking over a great book on the Athenian Acropolis (The Athenian Acropolis, by Jeffery M. Hurwit of the University of Oregon, Cambridge U. Press, 1999) as part of an answer to the question about Dark Age Greece.
Now this looks to be to be a fine combination of scholarship and archaeology, but then I don't usually see any problems with such things as reading texts and looking at evidence.
Anyway on page 71 there's a nice map of what the Acropolis was in Mycenean times, say in about 1150 BC, when the place was rather abruptly fortified.
Now, I guess "common sense" would say that nobody would suddenly build a huge Mycenean-style fortress on a relatively defensible spot in the middle of the collapse of the Mycenean palace regime....BUT, it apparently worked out okay in some way since there is no evidence that the place was taken and tradition suggests that "Athens" (whatever it might have been in 1100 BC) never fell to attackers at the onset of the Dark Ages.
Now this looks to be to be a fine combination of scholarship and archaeology, but then I don't usually see any problems with such things as reading texts and looking at evidence.
Anyway on page 71 there's a nice map of what the Acropolis was in Mycenean times, say in about 1150 BC, when the place was rather abruptly fortified.
Now, I guess "common sense" would say that nobody would suddenly build a huge Mycenean-style fortress on a relatively defensible spot in the middle of the collapse of the Mycenean palace regime....BUT, it apparently worked out okay in some way since there is no evidence that the place was taken and tradition suggests that "Athens" (whatever it might have been in 1100 BC) never fell to attackers at the onset of the Dark Ages.