In my WIP I use a real neighborhood within the limits of Cincinnati. My descriptions of the setting and the residents are accurate. Frankly I used this area because the residents could vanish and no one would spend a lot of time (the police for instance) looking for them. This particular area for the most part has two kinds of residents 1) those who are so poor and uneducated, they can't get out and 2) criminals who prey on the first group.
Now I could change the name of the neighborhood but I use landmarks like Cincinnati Music Hall and the abandoned subway system that runs under the area. I could change the name of Music Hall but the subway system still pegs the area and I need the subway because I turned it into a nice convenient torture chamber.
Is it a bad idea to diss the residents, even if it's the truth? Or what I really want to know is, can my negative descriptions get me in any kind of hot water. When I call them (group descriptions) losers and wh*res and dope dealers and say things like "no sane persone would enter the area after dark" am I setting myself up for legal problems? Assuming this ever sees publication.
Now I could change the name of the neighborhood but I use landmarks like Cincinnati Music Hall and the abandoned subway system that runs under the area. I could change the name of Music Hall but the subway system still pegs the area and I need the subway because I turned it into a nice convenient torture chamber.
Is it a bad idea to diss the residents, even if it's the truth? Or what I really want to know is, can my negative descriptions get me in any kind of hot water. When I call them (group descriptions) losers and wh*res and dope dealers and say things like "no sane persone would enter the area after dark" am I setting myself up for legal problems? Assuming this ever sees publication.
Something would be lost from those stories.