Someone famous--and of course, I've forgotten who--pointed out that there often isn't an internal logic to real life.
However, just like writing dialogue the way people actually speak would be obnoxious to read, writing life the way it happens is likely to be a disappointing experience for the reader. People accept real life because hey, it's what we've got to work with, and you don't have many other options. But there are TONS of other books, so they don't have to stand for yours if it's as inconsistent and tortured and meandering as reality.
People act very very stupid in real life, but if someone acts stupid in a book, people read it and go "Dude, nobody would be THAT stupid." Well, sure they would, but in a book it's really annoying.
Real life never wraps up the loose ends, it really usually IS the most likely suspect, and sometimes you never do find out whodunnit. This sort of behavior would aggravate the living hell out of readers, though.
So...err...yes, for my money, taken too far, it can be bad.