- Joined
- Jan 20, 2010
- Messages
- 454
- Reaction score
- 34
- Location
- London
- Website
- www.boyvsworld.blogspot.com
I've learned a lot about how to write. There are only a few more things that keep cropping up in my writing. Most of them I can solve myself, but one is a huge pain in the b-hole.
Word choice! Well, phrasing too. I've noticed that my writing sounds a lot more impressive if I make the wording as smart as it can be without sounding stuffy, but it really changes the mood of the whole piece.
I asked about something related to this in another thread so I'll just sum up why I'd like to know this: I write in third person and most of the voice is my own. I'd like to just go with my own wording whenever I'm not picking out a specific noun or strong verb but I can't tell if that's a bad idea. It's the style I plan to carry over between books whenever my narrator isn't using their voice.
For example. Here's a piece of my writing:
"Mortimer had been waving his flashlight around in the forest for a couple of hours before he finally found it: a boulder that jutted out of the grass at an angle, almost as if it was trying to impale the oak at the other end of the clearing."
"Mortimer had spent the best part of two hours trudging around the forest, his flashlight slicing through the darkness, when he finally stumbled across it: a mass of jagged rock that jutted out of the foliage at an angle, almost as though it were trying to impale the oak across the clearing."
Neither is better than the other but I know the second probably sounds a little bit better. On the other hand, the first comes more naturally, because it's pretty close to the way I speak (and the way I write most of the time when I'm online).
Is it wrong (for lack of a better word) to stick to a style that's basically cleaned up vernacular when you're not using your protagonist's voice or is a plainer style acceptable? (I'm wondering because I'd like to write alternate world/stories set in the past and I'm not sure if writing in our vernacular will still be appropriate).
ETA: Now that I think about it, I'm not sure this is a good example... but my question is still the same
Word choice! Well, phrasing too. I've noticed that my writing sounds a lot more impressive if I make the wording as smart as it can be without sounding stuffy, but it really changes the mood of the whole piece.
I asked about something related to this in another thread so I'll just sum up why I'd like to know this: I write in third person and most of the voice is my own. I'd like to just go with my own wording whenever I'm not picking out a specific noun or strong verb but I can't tell if that's a bad idea. It's the style I plan to carry over between books whenever my narrator isn't using their voice.
For example. Here's a piece of my writing:
"Mortimer had been waving his flashlight around in the forest for a couple of hours before he finally found it: a boulder that jutted out of the grass at an angle, almost as if it was trying to impale the oak at the other end of the clearing."
"Mortimer had spent the best part of two hours trudging around the forest, his flashlight slicing through the darkness, when he finally stumbled across it: a mass of jagged rock that jutted out of the foliage at an angle, almost as though it were trying to impale the oak across the clearing."
Neither is better than the other but I know the second probably sounds a little bit better. On the other hand, the first comes more naturally, because it's pretty close to the way I speak (and the way I write most of the time when I'm online).
Is it wrong (for lack of a better word) to stick to a style that's basically cleaned up vernacular when you're not using your protagonist's voice or is a plainer style acceptable? (I'm wondering because I'd like to write alternate world/stories set in the past and I'm not sure if writing in our vernacular will still be appropriate).
ETA: Now that I think about it, I'm not sure this is a good example... but my question is still the same
Last edited: