Elijah Phoenix said:
Publishers had to merge because they were all going broke because they were misreading the market. They learned from that.
Nowadays they don't look for a good story or clever writing. Will it sell?
The market is illiterate and tone deaf. Singers can't sell a record because people talking trash into microphones is what sells.
People that can actually play a musical instrument can't find work because people use electronic beats- they just push a button. In concert they play music tracks instead of bands playing instruments. Performers are so untalented they lip sync.
Book publishers have slush piles of great stories because they can't sell em.
Movie producers put out great flicks that bomb because the market is stupid.
TALENT IS NO LONGER SOUGHT OR APPRECIATED. WHO KNOWS, A BOOK WITH MADE UP LANGUAGE MAY WORK BECAUSE THE MARKET CAN'T READ ANYWAY. Listen to a rap record and tell me if you can hear or understand what they say while they're speed rappin. The electronic beat may sound good and the sounds of talking may blend, but you can't hardly hear a word. It's nuts anymore. crazy i tell ya.
Well, no on every count. Publishers didn't merge because they were going broke, they merged because they were making money and someone with a lot more money thought they were a good investment and literally bought as many publishers as possible. Publishers didn't say to each other, "Do you want to merge." In each case, one man, or one group, with billions of dollars, moved in and bought them up precisely because they were making money. The publishers had no say in the matter. Anything is for sale, if you have enough money to buy it.
And talent is sought after just as much as it ever was. Maybe more so. But talent can really only be defined by whether or not large numbers of people think something is worth reading, listening to, or viewing. If no one wants to read it, listen to it, or watch it, it isn't talent, it's just bad.
And it's easy to tell you've never actually seen a slush pile, let alone read thorugh one. I've read slush piles, or tried to, and believe me, what's in them is as far from great stories as it's possible to get. There are almost no good stories in them, let alone great ones. About 70% of what's in slush piles would make a saint start drinking, and another 20%, while not horrible, is still pretty bad. Bad enough it stands zero chance of ever selling. It simply isn't any good. If you're really, truly lucky, about 1% of what lands in slush piles even approaches good, and finding something that's actually great in a slush pile is as rare as finding chocolate pudding in a, uh, crap factory. And about as easy.
Thinking slush piles are full of great stories really is like thinking your commode is full of oversize Hershey Kisses.
And great flicks don't bomb because the audience is stupid, they bomb because the flick wasn't so great after all.