- Joined
- Mar 21, 2005
- Messages
- 36,987
- Reaction score
- 6,159
- Location
- The right earlobe of North America
I've been reading Bradbury's famous "Zen in the Art of Writing" (a great treasure, a copy signed by him at a conference I attended a few years ago), in the beginning of which he mentions authors who inspire him, some famous, some less so. Dickens, Twain, Shaw, but also Peacock and Wycherly.
Which set me thinking about similar matters, authors famous today for one or two works, but whose other material, often equally good, is mystifyingly neglected or forgotten. From my own favorites, some nominees:
First, as a preface, a pertinent anecdote: A critic I read some years ago said, "Students are taught to hate Faulkner by being forced to read The Sound and the Fury." I had the good fortune as an undergrad to take an American Lit class in Faulkner taught by a prominent Faulkner scholar, who would have agreed with the critic. Not because S&F is a bad novel, but because it is far from the first Faulkner anyone should read. His recommendations for introductory Faulkner reading? The Unvanquished, Sartoris, The Wild Palms. How many here have read those? My personal recommendation for Faulkner's real masterpiece? The Snopes Trilogy (The Hamlet, The Town, The Mansion); same question.
Others, from my experience:
William Golding; many people have read only Lord of the Flies, which is brilliant. But few have read the equally good second novel, The Inheritors.
Joseph Conrad; Heart of Darkness and Lord Jim are well known and well read today, but how about The Secret Agent, An Outcast of the Islands, Under Western Eyes, Victory?
Joseph Heller; yeah, Catch-22 has entered the language, but who here has read the excellent Something Happened, or Picture This?
Victor Hugo; we all know of the two biggies, Les Miserables and The Hunchback of Notre Dame, but who among you has read The Man Who Laughs, equally splendid and powerful?
Who else has nominees for undeservedly neglected books by authors famous today for only one or two things?
bird
Which set me thinking about similar matters, authors famous today for one or two works, but whose other material, often equally good, is mystifyingly neglected or forgotten. From my own favorites, some nominees:
First, as a preface, a pertinent anecdote: A critic I read some years ago said, "Students are taught to hate Faulkner by being forced to read The Sound and the Fury." I had the good fortune as an undergrad to take an American Lit class in Faulkner taught by a prominent Faulkner scholar, who would have agreed with the critic. Not because S&F is a bad novel, but because it is far from the first Faulkner anyone should read. His recommendations for introductory Faulkner reading? The Unvanquished, Sartoris, The Wild Palms. How many here have read those? My personal recommendation for Faulkner's real masterpiece? The Snopes Trilogy (The Hamlet, The Town, The Mansion); same question.
Others, from my experience:
William Golding; many people have read only Lord of the Flies, which is brilliant. But few have read the equally good second novel, The Inheritors.
Joseph Conrad; Heart of Darkness and Lord Jim are well known and well read today, but how about The Secret Agent, An Outcast of the Islands, Under Western Eyes, Victory?
Joseph Heller; yeah, Catch-22 has entered the language, but who here has read the excellent Something Happened, or Picture This?
Victor Hugo; we all know of the two biggies, Les Miserables and The Hunchback of Notre Dame, but who among you has read The Man Who Laughs, equally splendid and powerful?
Who else has nominees for undeservedly neglected books by authors famous today for only one or two things?
bird