A question about prologues.

Status
Not open for further replies.

inanna

Queen of Typos
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 1, 2005
Messages
199
Reaction score
18
Location
the desert
Hope not...

Because I'll be in the same boat as you, as mine is 15 pages. My theory (or wishful thinking, take your pick) is that if you can grab a reader from the first paragraph or two and keep them turning the pages, then what does it matter?

I find that when I'm reading something especially engrossing, I lose track of time, and I definitely don't count pages. Whether editors and agents feel the same way...I'm sure others know better and will have some good advice. :)
 

AdamH

Pumped Up Kicks
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 17, 2005
Messages
1,123
Reaction score
115
Location
Canada's Ocean Playground
I've read prologues that have gone on longer that and have been completely enthralled. I've also read prologues that are only a few pages long that felt like I was wading through molasses.

The short answer to your question: it all depends. If it's an attention grabber, it doesn't matter the number of pages.

Hope that helps! :)

-Adam
 

My-Immortal

Mr. Invisible
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Messages
4,882
Reaction score
932
I'm just curious - does it need to be a prologue? Can it be chapter one or is there a great time difference between your 'prologue' and your 'chapter one'?

Good luck with your writing. :)
 

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,767
Reaction score
4,662
Location
Scotland
longgd2 said:
Would a prologue of 14+ pages be too long in length?

In my humble opinion - yes, unless you are writing an enormous tome, but even so the question that needs to be answered is - do you need a prologue?

Seems to me that if it's not essential or simply a whole stack of background facts or not done properly all you are doing is jolting your reader when the story proper begins.

Is it there for a definite purpose, does there have to be a prologue, or is it being done just because it seems like a good idea? Are you sure you are starting your novel at the right point? Does the prologue contain information that could just as easily and more effectively be fed in later?

Just some thoughts.
 

maestrowork

Fear the Death Ray
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
43,746
Reaction score
8,654
Location
Los Angeles
Website
www.amazon.com
I'm not a big fan of prologue, and certainly not a long 15-page one. But if it's riveting and it hooks the readers right away, why not? I would suggest this: Is the prologue necessary? Can you make it Chapter 1? I mean if your prologue is just one long info dump or back story, you risk losing your readers in page 3 and they will never read the rest, or they'll just skip to the prologue and go straight to chapter 1. And if the prologue is part of the story and really well-done, then why not make it Chapter 1?
 

MarkPettus

Writer and Editor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Messages
227
Reaction score
37
Location
Ponte Vedra Beach, Fla.
Website
markpettus.com
That's an impossible question to answer objectively. Five pages might be too long, 100 pages might not be. Does it keep the reader engaged?

I suspect you're asking because you know it doesn't. If so, then you already know your answer. Rather than shortening your prologue, try improving your prologue. A prologue is what goes before, the story before the story. Make it an interesting story and the reader will let you have as many pages as you need.

Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong.
 

reph

Fig of authority
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
5,160
Reaction score
971
Location
On a fig tree, presumably
longgd2 said:
too long in length
Um, longgd2, if the prologue is written the same way your post is, a careful review might uncover places where you can shorten it.
 

Dawno

Shiny!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
11,261
Reaction score
3,280
Age
68
Location
someplace around here, anyone seen my keys?
In the Learn Writing with Uncle Jim thread there are several posts about prologues. Jim notes in one:
That being said: If you leave it as a prologue, half your readers won't read it.

That being said, I've used prologues in my own works about half the time.

We've been talking about rules? There are no rules. There are only guidelines, some of them stronger than others.

While most people are having great fun skiing down the slope on skis, every once in a while you'll see someone gliding up the slope on an ironing board and making it look easy.

"It works" trumps everything.

btw, I've indexed the whole thread so you can search the index for keywords and find more info. It's a sticky at the top of this forum.
 

Danger Jane

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 11, 2005
Messages
7,921
Reaction score
5,006
Location
Rome
I bet this'll be a giant debate within the next two hours.

Prologues can turn off people simply by their name. If there's any way to cut down, that'd probably be good. Sometimes the information it seems so important to throw in a somewhat random beginning can just as easily find its way in chapter four, when it's actually necessary information.

However.

Sometimes they're necessary. Sometimes the story starts before the STORY starts, but the prologue is plot, too. You are the ultimate judge.
 

aruna

On a wing and a prayer
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 14, 2005
Messages
12,862
Reaction score
2,846
Location
A Small Town in Germany
Website
www.sharonmaas.co.uk

MarkPettus

Writer and Editor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Messages
227
Reaction score
37
Location
Ponte Vedra Beach, Fla.
Website
markpettus.com
If your prologue segues into your next chapter, then calling it Chapter 1 shouldn't be a problem.

I changed my prologue to Chapter 1 (following Uncle Jim's general advice), until 3 different editors told me to change it back. A prologue is a prologue. Don't be afraid of using it when you need to. Steve Berry's last book opened at number 13 on the NYTBS list, and when I asked him if he ever had trouble getting people to read his prologues, he looked at me like I was nuts. "Not if I write a good one."

If you write it well, most readers will go along with you (do be aware of who your readers are... my target reader may not respond the same way yours will).

Relabeling may also be successful if, instead of calling it a prologue, you give it a title (or if you title all of your chapters).

Know This, Brave Knight,​
Lest My Story Seem Fantastic
 
Last edited:

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,159
Location
The right earlobe of North America
I can't see any good reason why you HAVE to call anything a "prologue". I think the word itself carries a tinge of stuffy pretension, and I think that may be why some readers either dislike prologues, or skip them. It has little to do with content. In any case, the beginning of your story has to grab the attention of the reader, whether you call it a prologue or not.

bird
 

HConn

Whore for genre
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
814
Reaction score
182
Location
Inside a cursed painting
Website
www.harryjconnolly.com
Maybe someone mentioned this already, but there are two kinds of prologs. One is a scene or sequence that sets up the rest of the story. The other kind is an infodump like the history of the Galactic Hegemony and a listing of the 9 Noble Houses and their Dominion Worlds (complete with tech levels and primary exports.)

The first kind can be relabeled Chapter 1. The second should be cut altogether.
 

Vincent

Cheers
Poetry Book Collaborator
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,934
Reaction score
469
Now, if my horrible mess of a WIP had a rather lengthy prologue set some 500 years before the events of the bulk of the story, but still shared one important character between them? Does that sound like a waste of time, and a waste of a good oportunity to introduce the readers to my protagonist? I can't imagine renaming it chapter one, i don't consider it an info dump, but geez, i just had so much fun writing it.
 

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,767
Reaction score
4,662
Location
Scotland
beezle said:
Now, if my horrible mess of a WIP had a rather lengthy prologue set some 500 years before the events of the bulk of the story, but still shared one important character between them? Does that sound like a waste of time, and a waste of a good oportunity to introduce the readers to my protagonist? I can't imagine renaming it chapter one, i don't consider it an info dump, but geez, i just had so much fun writing it.

One usually does have fun writing a prologue. You may not consider it an infodump and think it is a good way to introduce your character, but because by definition a prologue is background and history, the crunch question remains - is it absolutely necessary for the reader to know all this history and background in advance, in preference to meeting and finding out about the character and past events as the story unfolds?
 

longgd2

Registered
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Location
New Jersey
Should I just change my prologue to chapter 1 if it is about the protagonist's father, takes place seven years prior start of the story and helps setup the events?
 

inanna

Queen of Typos
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 1, 2005
Messages
199
Reaction score
18
Location
the desert
longgd2 said:
Should I just change my prologue to chapter 1 if it is about the protagonist's father, takes place seven years prior start of the story and helps setup the events?

I imagine others will disagree, but I'm still saying "No". I think what you've described is a good example of exactly what belongs in a prologue (provided it's not chock full of unnecessary info-dumping) and frankly, I'm a little puzzled by the aversion some seem to have to them.

I haven't read your story, so I'm guessing, but if you were to change it to Chapter 1, and then leave the character of the father behind to focus on the son for awhile, the reader might become puzzled, as you have set up an expectation that the father is a main character. IMHO, I think it could be jarring to shift to the son's POV, and then distracting as the reader wonders and waits to hear about the father. We tend to connect with the characters to whom we are introduced first.

That's why (again, IMHO as an unpublished writer :)) prologues exist. The American Heritage Dictionary defines one as "an introductory act, event, or period". If yours meets that criteria and isn't boring, then I think it should remain a prologue.

I hope that wasn't a rant...:mad::)
 

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,767
Reaction score
4,662
Location
Scotland
inanna said:
I'm a little puzzled by the aversion some seem to have to them.

I don't think it's an aversion to one. It's just that some folks think they have to have a Prologue before thinking through what a prologue really is, and reasoning out whether it is necessary to have one or if the telling of the tale would benefit from the information being imparted later in a different or even better manner.

In other words, particularly where first-time novels are concerned, a prologue is often used for no other reason than the fact that the information exists and it 'seems like a good idea'.
 

inanna

Queen of Typos
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 1, 2005
Messages
199
Reaction score
18
Location
the desert
Bufty said:
I don't think it's an aversion to one. It's just that some folks think they have to have a Prologue before thinking through what a prologue really is, and reasoning out whether it is necessary to have one or if the telling of the tale would benefit from the information being imparted later in a different or even better manner.

In other words, particularly where first-time novels are concerned, a prologue is often used for no other reason than the fact that the information exists and it 'seems like a good idea'.

I agree, and I'm thinking that maybe a lot of people have burned by bad prologues in the past, especially those of the info-dump variety. But someone metioned in another thread (Aruna, maybe?) that trying to weave her prologue into the main story would (and I'm paraphrasing) make for more awkward moments of info-dump. You know, those "she suddenly remembered the day when..." kind of moments. Yuck.

Bad prologues suck, but if the prologue is interesting and has something the reader needs to know ahead of time, then why shouldn't it be there?
 

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,767
Reaction score
4,662
Location
Scotland
inanna said:
Bad prologues suck, but if the prologue is interesting and has something the reader needs to know ahead of time, then why shouldn't it be there?

No reason at all.:flag:
 

alleycat

Still around
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
72,918
Reaction score
12,273
Location
Tennessee
I decide on a book-by-book basis. My first inclination is to skip a prologue unless it's relatively short; seems relevent (in other words, appears to contain information that will contribute to the richness of the story; and not just the writer "setting the stage" ); and is well-written.

And In classics where some scholar has written an introduction, I skip it but sometimes go back and read it after I've read the book.

I'm not arguing for and against prologues; that's just my opinion as a reader.

ac
 
Status
Not open for further replies.