http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/oct/31/nicholas-ostler-my-bright-idea
Personally, I don't believe it will. He seems to be avoiding the issues of cultural identity relating to English [just look at French]. I think the biggest threat is trying to freeze it in a moment of time and restrict it's growth.
I find the Latin argument deeply flawed. The true reason for the demise of Latin was The Reformation, when it became 'too Catholic.' The rise of vernacular English was the desire for a language that was seen as more 'English' [pre-standardization of course, then Caxton changed everything
.] Latin of course lives on in English and its grammar.
Personally, I don't believe it will. He seems to be avoiding the issues of cultural identity relating to English [just look at French]. I think the biggest threat is trying to freeze it in a moment of time and restrict it's growth.
I find the Latin argument deeply flawed. The true reason for the demise of Latin was The Reformation, when it became 'too Catholic.' The rise of vernacular English was the desire for a language that was seen as more 'English' [pre-standardization of course, then Caxton changed everything
