Here you go folks, the sweet and charming peoples at PA sent this to my cousin today in response to her request for her rights to be returned
does that sound threatening to you? cause she's thinking of suing, and given that she live in Belfast, she'd do it under the terrorism act, terror being legally defined as 'inciting fear through threatening behaviour'
Dear xxxxxx:
"If you return my rights promptly and without hassle then I will consider not suing you for damages and distress."
How about this instead: your contract remains in place and in full force, and we're looking forward to seeing you in court.
Be sure to ask your buddy David Kuzminski how he liked that experience, facing PublishAmerica's lawyer in court. Just like you, he made a big hoopla on the internet. He was served a summons to attend trial and testify, and a judgement was entered by a jury. What he said was found to be simply, plainly, false and malicious, and the jury rejected his testimony. He was ordered to pay $53,000 in damages, and his paychecks are being garnished as we speak. Also, with this type of judgement, seizing personal property is a common occurrence.
Enjoy Belfast while you still can.
does that sound threatening to you? cause she's thinking of suing, and given that she live in Belfast, she'd do it under the terrorism act, terror being legally defined as 'inciting fear through threatening behaviour'

