I've posted in the novel section about my problem, in Uncle Jim's thread no less, but I'm not getting an answer and I'm waiting to to get started for the night. So, I'm working on a satire about a regular guy, regular problems, but life's standing still for him and he's stuck in a rut, and so far I've been writing it in present tense ... but for some reason I'm starting to think that maybe past tense would be better/easier/more engaging. I'm only 20k into it so far and think that if I'm going to make the change I should do it now to save on leg work in the editing process. Do you think I should? I'm comfortable writing both and writers who inspire me are on either side of the tense line: Hunter S. Thompson and Jeff Lindsay past, Chuck Palahniuk and Bret Easton Ellis present. I know that doesn't have a hell of a lot to do with anything but let me ramble because I'm so confused.
Really, I just want opinions on this. And I turn to you guys, my satire friends, for advice.
Edit: Sorry, this is in first person. I'm that worked up about this that I'm not thinking straight and keep chewing on the corner of my monitor. Tastes like shit.
Really, I just want opinions on this. And I turn to you guys, my satire friends, for advice.
Edit: Sorry, this is in first person. I'm that worked up about this that I'm not thinking straight and keep chewing on the corner of my monitor. Tastes like shit.
Last edited: