Is it wrong for a bad guy to have an "average joe" type of name? One of my beta readers pointed out to me that he really liked some of the names I came up with, but for one of the bad guys, he said the name sounded rather plain (well, at this point in the story too, the bad guy is more or less just another "average joe" too).
Should I change his name, or just give him a nickname (ala Darth Vader)? When you first read about the bad guy, he's just another average joe, but by the time you see him again in the story, 50 years have passed, and that "joe badguy" has become an emperor (and it wasn't easy for him either, as he had to fight through a brutal civil war in-between).
As for his importance, well, he will be the guy responsible for bringing the hero into the war in the story, but after that, I try not to focus on the "high level politics" and stuff like that, instead showing the hero and the bad guys he meets afterwards. I guess he's comparable to the Emperor in the original Star Wars Trilogy to use a relatively common example; you know he's in charge, but he's not the main focus. That bad guy will come into play again, but the hero for the most part doesn't really concern about him because he's got lots of other baddies to worry about.
So, do you guys try and give your villians memorable names right away, or do you try to build up their reputation with a "plain jane-type" name to make them memorable that way?
Should I change his name, or just give him a nickname (ala Darth Vader)? When you first read about the bad guy, he's just another average joe, but by the time you see him again in the story, 50 years have passed, and that "joe badguy" has become an emperor (and it wasn't easy for him either, as he had to fight through a brutal civil war in-between).
As for his importance, well, he will be the guy responsible for bringing the hero into the war in the story, but after that, I try not to focus on the "high level politics" and stuff like that, instead showing the hero and the bad guys he meets afterwards. I guess he's comparable to the Emperor in the original Star Wars Trilogy to use a relatively common example; you know he's in charge, but he's not the main focus. That bad guy will come into play again, but the hero for the most part doesn't really concern about him because he's got lots of other baddies to worry about.
So, do you guys try and give your villians memorable names right away, or do you try to build up their reputation with a "plain jane-type" name to make them memorable that way?
Classic, Niesta. Sounds like an Austin Powers villain.