Author bashing is nothing new

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mr Flibble

They've been very bad, Mr Flibble
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 6, 2008
Messages
18,889
Reaction score
5,030
Location
We couldn't possibly do that. Who'd clear up the m
Website
francisknightbooks.co.uk
In the light of all the anti Brown and Meyer sentiment....There ain't nothing new under the sun, as this book shows.


American Norman Mailer, who died in 2007, did nothing to hide his contempt for Tom Wolfe's bulky novel A Man in Full.
He said: 'At certain points, reading the work can even be said to resemble the act of making love to a 300lb woman. Once she gets on top, it's all over. Fall in love, or be asphyxiated.'




And then there's George Bernard Shaw on the Bard: "With the single exception of Homer, there is no eminent writer, not even Sir Walter Scott,whom I can despise so entirely as I despise Shakespeare."

Even Byron asked for Keats to be flayed



 

Rolling Thunder

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 12, 2006
Messages
15,209
Reaction score
5,342
As long as discussions are based on the pros/cons merits/disadvantages of a given writer's work, we let them stand. But we'll still lock them when they begin to swirl down the drain.
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2005
Messages
47,985
Reaction score
13,247
There's a difference between author bashing and writing bashing.

Most of what I see here is dissing the work, not the person behind it and if you give good reasons for your dislike, that's perfectly okay with me. Reasoned argument is never mindless 'bashing'.
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,159
Location
The right earlobe of North America
I think this tendency goes back at least to Roman satirist Juvenal, and quite possibly to Aristophanes.

And to be able to bash 'em, they gotta be published first.

caw
 

lucidzfl

Back from the dead
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 13, 2009
Messages
2,757
Reaction score
517
I think this tendency goes back at least to Roman satirist Juvenal, and quite possibly to Aristophanes.

And to be able to bash 'em, they gotta be published first.

caw

Its like the ancient saying of the seafaring Aegeans,

"That fuckin' bitch cain't write SHIT!"
 

Mr Flibble

They've been very bad, Mr Flibble
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 6, 2008
Messages
18,889
Reaction score
5,030
Location
We couldn't possibly do that. Who'd clear up the m
Website
francisknightbooks.co.uk
Most of what I see here is dissing the work, not the person behind it and if you give good reasons for your dislike, that's perfectly okay with me. Reasoned argument is never mindless 'bashing'.

Absolutely - there's no accounting for taste. Subjective and all that.

Although I think that as writers, the people quoted were at least more literary about their dislike. ( and mostly they too were dissing the work, not the writer. Still, it's gotta sting a bit...) :D
 

panda

its harders sto type withh paaws
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
284
Reaction score
25
I think that's the worst when other published authors go after other authors, its like a break in the author code lol. Like Stephen King bashes Twilight and Meyer for not being a good writer. It's like how rude. And also, I would be laughing all the way to the bank if I were a published, super rich author. I could care less about nasty comments then, cause it's sort of like calling Michael Phelps a slow swimmer lol. :D
 

benbradley

It's a doggy dog world
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
20,321
Reaction score
3,513
Location
Transcending Canines
As long as discussions are based on the pros/cons merits/disadvantages of a given writer's work, we let them stand. But we'll still lock them when they begin to swirl down the drain.
So I suppose some of those famous writers wouldn't last long on AW...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.