I found an interview with a well-published chick-lit author. The interviewer asked her why she decided to write her second novel in different points of view, when her first novel was written in first person.
Her response was that most writers choose first person for their first novel, and that it tends to be highly autobiographical. It's just something that first-time novelists do. And that she wanted to try something different for her second novel.
So, go figure, the novel I'm writing, my first, is in first person and happens to be highly autobiographical.
Is this something I should try to avoid? I was toying with the idea of third person alternating between the two MCs anyway. Would people read a first person novel and think "oh, that reeks of a first-time author"?
I didn't know that this was a trend that existed. Is it true, or was she mistaken? Should I try to be different, or is it okay to do what is expected?
Her response was that most writers choose first person for their first novel, and that it tends to be highly autobiographical. It's just something that first-time novelists do. And that she wanted to try something different for her second novel.
So, go figure, the novel I'm writing, my first, is in first person and happens to be highly autobiographical.
Is this something I should try to avoid? I was toying with the idea of third person alternating between the two MCs anyway. Would people read a first person novel and think "oh, that reeks of a first-time author"?
I didn't know that this was a trend that existed. Is it true, or was she mistaken? Should I try to be different, or is it okay to do what is expected?