- Joined
- Aug 1, 2005
- Messages
- 1,733
- Reaction score
- 52
In a thread quite sometime ago, I asked how one recognised that one had written a 'good one'?
Recently, I was watching Polanski's 'Repulsion', and in one of the interview segments, Polanski seems to indicate that he and his co-writer worked on the 'Repulsion' script for 2 years? (I presume while also working on other projects).
I have read that the screenwriter of "Stranger Than Fiction" took 1.5 years til he felt it was a 'good one'. As contrast, Tarantino is reported to have written "Pulp Fiction" in 3 weeks, IIRC.
Elsewhere, I read that you're looking at an average of 6 months to arrive at a 'good one'. That is, finished rewritten and now a pristine product.
In terms of duration to write the 'good one', it isn't all over the map, is it?
Recently, I was watching Polanski's 'Repulsion', and in one of the interview segments, Polanski seems to indicate that he and his co-writer worked on the 'Repulsion' script for 2 years? (I presume while also working on other projects).
I have read that the screenwriter of "Stranger Than Fiction" took 1.5 years til he felt it was a 'good one'. As contrast, Tarantino is reported to have written "Pulp Fiction" in 3 weeks, IIRC.
Elsewhere, I read that you're looking at an average of 6 months to arrive at a 'good one'. That is, finished rewritten and now a pristine product.
In terms of duration to write the 'good one', it isn't all over the map, is it?