How historicaly accurate are historical romances?

Status
Not open for further replies.

wannawrite

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 29, 2009
Messages
819
Reaction score
248
Location
Kansas
Website
www.kcwildwood.net
Question. I am considering writing a historical romance for Harlequin. It is based in the American west, circa 1878, Colorado, specifically.

I have researched the region, the clothing, the attitudes, the employment, the buildings, etc...

I am fine with all that.

BUT....

The town that I wanted to have my story take place in still exists, today, and the story is not flattering to the town, at all. Do I mention the town by name, or do I just make up the name of a new town and mention the geographic region, in general? Would that still be considered historically accurate? To 'make believe' an entire town? Even if it WAS historically correct, in all other respects....

Now, I know that larger towns are customarily referred to as backdrop locations, such as Chicago, Boston and New Orleans. But in terms of smaller towns, I looked up some of Harlequin's recent historical releases that speak of small towns, and they seem to be real places...except they are mostly ghost towns, now. Or have very few residents, at most. Spring Creek, Texas, for example. Real place. Almost died out. (I googled it)

Any advice would be appreciated. I can easily rename my town and still give the 'flavor' and feeling that I am hoping for, without stepping on anyone's toes. Just don't know what the right protocol is, here.

Thanks for the advice, in advance.
 

DeleyanLee

Writing Anarchist
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 6, 2007
Messages
31,667
Reaction score
11,425
Location
lost among the words
The history in Historical Romance has more to do with the time period than facts like town names. Personally, I'd rather change the name then use a factual town because then no one can come back and argue with me about the location of a building or street (yes, readers do that).

Make it up. It's a time-honored tradition and doesn't get in the way of a good story.
 

wannawrite

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 29, 2009
Messages
819
Reaction score
248
Location
Kansas
Website
www.kcwildwood.net
That's the kind of info I was looking for. I didn't know whether or not changing the name of the town would disavow the authenticity, but I guess not, huh?

Thanks!
 

LorelieBrown

Got the hang of it, here
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
640
Reaction score
136
I vote for making up a town. Or at least renaming an existing one and tweaking it as you like. As long as you get the life-details right, should be good.
 

Cathy C

Ooo! Shiny new cover!
Kind Benefactor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 5, 2005
Messages
9,907
Reaction score
1,835
Location
Hiding in my writing cave
Website
www.cathyclamp.com
Coloradoans are well aware of some of the negative problems in towns in that time period. I'd leave it as is UNTIL you have an offer to publish. Then simply discuss it with your editor and see if they're okay with it or if they want you to change the location/name slightly.

History buffs are notorious for wanting accuracy. I wrote some pretty negative stuff in my book in that era and location. I'd leave it. For now. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.