is alright alright?

Status
Not open for further replies.

StephanieWeippert

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
85
Reaction score
12
Location
Washington State
I've read in two different books on writing that the word alright shouldn't be used because it makes your writing sound unprofessional. I did a word search for it and found I only use it in conversations, not in my descriptions etc., and not in every conversation either. I like having it in my conversations though, I think it makes my characters sound more real. Should I still banish it?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 7, 2005
Messages
47,985
Reaction score
13,247
I think when people sound as if they're saying 'alright', they're actually saying "All right," which is two separate words.

You could probably get away with it in dialogue, though, but not description. 'Alright' simply isn't a word, although it's becoming more and more common. It wouldn't surprise me if it is in the dictionary, even though it gives me the heebie-jeebies.
 

Fade

The Captain of My Soul
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 1, 2009
Messages
597
Reaction score
73
Location
USA
I used to put all right as just one word, but I finally took it out of my manuscript. It's easy to do. Just find and replace "alright" with "all right".
 

eyeblink

Barbara says hi
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 14, 2007
Messages
6,391
Reaction score
1,016
Location
Aldershot, UK
However UNFORTUNATELY it is accepted as an alternative spelling to "all right" in the Oxford English Dictionary.
 

Rolling Thunder

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 12, 2006
Messages
15,209
Reaction score
5,342
I refuse to give up alright. It saves a whole letter making my work even that more tight and golden.
 

Maryn

I Tried
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
64,176
Reaction score
43,255
Location
Behind you!
Alright will probably be considered fully acceptable by the time I die. My kids, both sticklers about written English, accept it. As my son puts it, "Maybe we should kill you now."

Kid's always thought a little ways outside the box.

Maryn, rigid and unable to change
 

semilargeintestine

BassGirl 5000
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
4,763
Reaction score
1,034
It bothers me that "words" are put into the dictionary because people are too ignorant to realise they're not using real words.
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2005
Messages
47,985
Reaction score
13,247
I bet it sounds hot in an Aussie accent though. Now stop threadstalking me! :D

(No, don't.) ;)
 

MetalDog

Woof!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 5, 2009
Messages
288
Reaction score
44
Location
Greater London
It bothers me that "words" are put into the dictionary because people are too ignorant to realise they're not using real words.

That's how the English language evolves. The alternative is to try to forbid anyone from making up new words (or altering old ones via common usage) and then get all impotently angry when they do it anyway. Shakespeare was a massive offender on this front.

Some new words and phrases annoy me, but I'd rather put up with them than try to mummify the language.
 

veinglory

volitare nequeo
Self-Ban
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
28,750
Reaction score
2,937
Location
right here
Website
www.veinglory.com
Given that I have only seen editors specifiy that they hate it, and none specify that they love it--better safe...
 

CatSlave

Mah tale iz draggin.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 22, 2006
Messages
3,720
Reaction score
620
Location
Paradise Found: Bradenton, FL
However UNFORTUNATELY it is accepted as an alternative spelling to "all right" in the Oxford English Dictionary.
Then let it stay there where it belongs, and quit wandering about and annoying serious readers.

Along with who's, irregardless and 'to be perfectly honest'...
 

colealpaugh

"Bear trumps Elephants!"
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 27, 2009
Messages
952
Reaction score
171
Location
Northeast Pennsylvania
Website
www.colealpaugh.com
It bothers me that "words" are put into the dictionary because people are too ignorant to realise they're not using real words.

Agree completely.

That's how the English language evolves. The alternative is to try to forbid anyone from making up new words (or altering old ones via common usage) and then get all impotently angry when they do it anyway. Shakespeare was a massive offender on this front.

Some new words and phrases annoy me, but I'd rather put up with them than try to mummify the language.

That's fair and true, but it's become a fast moving snowball. IMHO, there's a huge difference between words being accepted into a dictionary because of ignorant over-use such as 'alright' and words such as ringtone, soul patch, and bioiesel. After all, 'wave pools' are fun.
 

MetalDog

Woof!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 5, 2009
Messages
288
Reaction score
44
Location
Greater London
I just think common usage should be greeted with a little less outright hate. A lot of the words that grammar gurus will fight tooth and nail to uphold now were yesterday's 'oh, that's so ignorant!' bugbears. =)

If there had been an English Académie Française, it would have tried to rob our language of a lot of its present delights.
 

semilargeintestine

BassGirl 5000
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
4,763
Reaction score
1,034
I agree to an extent, but words that are added simply because people can't speak properly is a bit excessive.
 

colealpaugh

"Bear trumps Elephants!"
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 27, 2009
Messages
952
Reaction score
171
Location
Northeast Pennsylvania
Website
www.colealpaugh.com
It's just that some words never leave the 'cringe' stage. On a message board, woulda/coulda/sorta/dunno and even words like 'ain't' can be fine. But 'alright' just makes a lot of people cringe, in my experience. It just feels ignorant and seems in need of correction. No hate intended. Just a discussion with words used to express the 'senses' evoked. And alright sorta evokes "stupid" instead of casual.
 

Chiquita Banana

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 14, 2009
Messages
425
Reaction score
35
Website
libby-mercer.blogspot.com
It's just that some words never leave the 'cringe' stage. On a message board, woulda/coulda/sorta/dunno and even words like 'ain't' can be fine. But 'alright' just makes a lot of people cringe, in my experience. It just feels ignorant and seems in need of correction. No hate intended. Just a discussion with words used to express the 'senses' evoked. And alright sorta evokes "stupid" instead of casual.



I agree that it SEEMS like most people who use it don't actually know 'alright' is wrong. A bit like 'supposebly' I think, although no one ever writes that. Lots of people say it though!
 

Swordswoman

Resilient and kind
Kind Benefactor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
687
Reaction score
465
Location
UK
That's how the English language evolves. The alternative is to try to forbid anyone from making up new words (or altering old ones via common usage) and then get all impotently angry when they do it anyway. Shakespeare was a massive offender on this front.

Some new words and phrases annoy me, but I'd rather put up with them than try to mummify the language.

I'd totally agree we ought to be open to neologisms. Chaucer and Shakespeare formed the language like that, and it's great it still continues.

But enshrining mistakes in dictionary tablets of stone is, I think, somewhat different. Where do you draw the line? How long before 'alot' (one word) is acceptable? Or 'Iam'? Both common mistakes, heaven help us, by people who haven't worked out what an indefinite article or a pronoun are. But they're common, right? Understood, right? Doesn't that make them 'alright'?

No, no, no, no, no. Never. Neologisms should expand a language, not shrink it to the lowest common denominator.

Please - no.
 
Last edited:

semilargeintestine

BassGirl 5000
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
4,763
Reaction score
1,034
I'd totally agree we ought to be open to neologisms. Chaucer and Shakespeare formed the language like that, and it's great it still continues.

But enshrining mistakes in dictionary tablets of stone is, I think, somewhat different. Where do you draw the line? How long before 'alot' (one word) is acceptable? Or 'Iam'? Both common mistakes, heaven help us, by people who haven't worked out what an indefinate article or a pronoun are. But they're common, right? Understood, right? Doesn't that make them 'alright'?

No, no, no, no, no. Never. Neologisms should expand a language, not shrink it to the lowest common denominator.

Please - no.

Too bloody right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.