- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
- Messages
- 1,626
- Reaction score
- 110
Just out of curiosity, who owns the content on AW? Could Uncle Jim edit his thread and publish a book from it? Not trying to start trouble, purely curious about the copyright status of posts.
Correct, sir! Although there is an implied license to publish (whatever that means—believe it or not, the Copyright Act doesn't define it for text!) in the forum and the form of AW, there is no transfer of any other right. Each individual poster owns the copyright in his/her own work, even without putting a copyright notice on it, and despite any countervailing "notice" on the page (take a look at Tripod some time).James D. Macdonald said:As I understand it, the individual posters own the content of their own posts.
Your understanding is correct.Kasey Mackenzie said:Awww, so even message boards that CLAIM they own the copyright on your posts don't really? Even if they state otherwise on their websites and say that by using the webboard you are agreeing otherwise? (Just curious--I don't tend to post anything on webboards I wouldn't be willing to give up the copyright on. But I do frequent one place in particular that says it owns whatever you post on its website.)
Jaws said:Always remember this:
If you didn't put a signature on a piece of paper that said so, you didn't transfer your copyright.
That's generally true, but the Copyright Act specifically requires a signed writing. It's a special case. The general rules of contract law are only general rules.jules said:I thought any contract could transfer copyright, and that contracts can be formed by clicking a button, as long as there is clear text that indicates what you're agreeing to.