Well I mean, abandoning electronic sampling in favor of live instrumentation seems to me about as mold-breaking as you can get.
Then you'll be flying high if you listen to Olafur Arnalds, Tycho, and other turntablists who use live samples (sometimes sampling live) to make electronic music. It's nothing new. Electronic beats are still samples from real sounds.
Especially for a group that's genre famously rinses and repeats. But I do understand not appreciating the vast departure. If I had been a hardcore Daft Punk fan DURING the "Discovery" era I may have a similar opinion. I think new Daft Punk fans or fans that jumped in around the "Human After All" or even the "TRON" era will get a lot more enjoyment out of it than older fans will. And with all that said, 8.8 is still a fantastic score. I can live with it.
Daft Punk really got popular as the French House scene died off--the scene that they were big apart of. Just like James Blake right now who was big in the British Dubstep scene and really came out as Dubstep died off. They, just like Blake right now, are/have evolved the music scene and ushered in a new sound.
There was a lot of talk about Daft Punk's new album making waves. But, its just not. It's good, but just not what we were hoping for after a 8 year absence to their own music.
The year before last was all about sythpop making a come back.
Last year was about rap coming out.
This year is all about returning to the performer's roots. Daft Punk, James Blake, The Men, The Dear Hunter, David Bowie, Willy Moon, We Are Standard, Tribes, The Flaming Lips, Phosphorescent, Sigur Ros (Oh, I'm steamed with these guys). They all are putting albums that they are comfortable with.