Read Books By AWers!

Welcome to the AbsoluteWrite Water Cooler! Please read The Newbie Guide To Absolute Write

editing for authors ad

A publisher or agency using Google ads to solicit your novel probably isn't anyone you want to write for.


Go Back   Absolute Write Water Cooler > Pop Culture > AW Bookclub
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-20-2011, 07:53 PM   #1
MonochromeSky
The Explorer
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4
MonochromeSky is on a distinguished road
Humbert Humbert's intentions in Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov

So, I recentley finished a large thesis paper on Lolita, specifically focusing on the character of Humbert Humbert. As I finished the paper, I raised an interesting question for myself. I argued in my paper that Humbert was trying to manipulate the reader into sympathizing with him, but ultimately failed because he makes the act of manipulation too conspicuous to the reader.

I realized, however, that because the reader realizes how much Humbert lies to them, it is impossible to judge him at all. The reader has no reliable information to go by. So do you think that might have been his true goal? To make it impossible for the reader to judge him at all? Or do you think it was something else entirely?
MonochromeSky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 06:00 AM   #2
childeroland
What happened to my LIFE?!
 
childeroland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,736
childeroland is a glorious beacon of lightchilderoland is a glorious beacon of lightchilderoland is a glorious beacon of light
For what it's worth, Nabokov labeled Humbert Humbert Humbert "a vain and cruel wretch who manages to appear 'touching.'" At the very end I think Humbert does come as clean to the reader as he can, but he cannot rid himself of his nympholepsy (realizing that his 'moral apotheosis' can't make up for destroying Lolita's life, even as he asks the 'aged' Dolores Haze to leave her husband and come away with him) and so his entire 'memoir' can't help but be a celebration of it.
__________________
Perhaps the most amazing thing about the universe is that we could create an infinite catalogue of things, worlds and beings that no one has seen and which do not exist. Each story in the realm of fiction is a small part of that catalogue.
childeroland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 06:28 AM   #3
Celia Cyanide
Joker Groupie
 
Celia Cyanide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: probably watching DARK KNIGHT
Posts: 13,313
Celia Cyanide is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsCelia Cyanide is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsCelia Cyanide is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsCelia Cyanide is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsCelia Cyanide is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsCelia Cyanide is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsCelia Cyanide is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsCelia Cyanide is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsCelia Cyanide is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsCelia Cyanide is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsCelia Cyanide is so great that we've run out of appropriate compliments
What a truly excellent topic.

I do agree that Humbert is unreliable, and perhaps the best example of an unreliable narrator I can think of, with the possible of exception of the narrator in Poe's "A Telltale Heart." Humbert wants to convince us that there is nothing wrong with who he is, and keeps comparing himself to others whom he feels are morally worse than he is.

However, I disagree that it is impossible to judge him. Even the unreliable narrator doesn't lie his way through the story. He misinterprets. We do know the nature of his relationship with Lolita, and no matter how he tries to justify it, we know he is wrong. And we can judge him for it.
__________________
My feature film WHY AM I IN A BOX? is now online! I wrote, directed, and acted in it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzglH...ature=youtu.be

my IMDB page: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2097751/

My decoupage shoes:

http://celiacyanide.tumblr.com/
Celia Cyanide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 06:40 AM   #4
dolores haze
ageing savage
 
dolores haze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: the sticks
Posts: 4,682
dolores haze is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsdolores haze is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsdolores haze is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsdolores haze is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsdolores haze is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsdolores haze is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsdolores haze is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsdolores haze is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsdolores haze is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsdolores haze is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsdolores haze is so great that we've run out of appropriate compliments
And yet countless numbers of readers regard 'Lolita' as a love story. The sheer numbers of these convince me that HH did win the sympathy of many.

It's not a love story, of course. I have no problem judging HH for the monster he is. Witty, erudite, intelligent, sometimes charming, but still a monster. Lo's "sobs in the night, every night, every night," make it all too clear what HH is.
dolores haze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 05:08 AM   #5
RiseBeauty
figuring it all out
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 70
RiseBeauty is on a distinguished road
I agree with Celia, this is a great topic!

After I read Lolita I found it shocking that this was considered by many to be a love story. I thought it was more like a bizarre horror story--an in the mind of the monster sort of tale.

IMO, HH was trying to justify his actions by presenting the truth as it seemed in his twisted mind. However, HH knew the "relationship" was unacceptable or he would not have gone to such extremes to hide it from others throughout the story. Yet, he attempts to present his point of view in a manner that he believes may garner sympathy, especially when he hints this is not what he is looking for at all. This is what made him unreliable to me.

For me HH's lies are what made it possible for me to form a judgment about him. HH presented Lolita as a seductress but her interactions with him and what he observed told another story. Comparing what was there with how HH perceived it was what I found most revealing and sad. This is what caused me to view him more as a deluded master manipulator who was attempting to deceive the reader the same way he had fooled other characters in the novel. Initially he appeared to others in the book as a seemingly charming man but there was something...not quite right. The reader gets to see behind the curtain.

I wish I had the story in front of me because there are places where I marked pages in the book about this. The details of what I read are foggy in my memory.

Thanks for posting this topic, MonochromeSky!
RiseBeauty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 03:35 PM   #6
scarletpeaches
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 48,359
scarletpeaches is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsscarletpeaches is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsscarletpeaches is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsscarletpeaches is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsscarletpeaches is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsscarletpeaches is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsscarletpeaches is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsscarletpeaches is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsscarletpeaches is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsscarletpeaches is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsscarletpeaches is so great that we've run out of appropriate compliments
I've only read this book once and I'm far from an expert, but for me Lolita changed from a love story to a...I hesitate to use the word 'horror'...something more sinister about halfway through.

Some of the prose was so beautiful and precise I had to stop and catch my breath, but as the novel progressed, I got shivers more and more often. HH and Lolita's intercourse (and I mean that in the truest sense of the word, as in, interactions) went from playful - at least that's how they were presented - to reluctant. HH began to report more and more often, Lolita saying things like "Oh no, not again," whenever he became aroused. Maybe she'd said things like that before but only now was he willing to relate such words. Perhaps a beginning of him taking her resistance and putting it down to "See? I told you nymphets eventually grow up and turn into spoiled brats." He could see it coming - he knew he'd eventually have to acknowledge her fighting him off, if only with words - but he justifies it not by saying it's rape, but "Lolita. Such a spoiled child."

Anyhoo, them's the first impressions of a one-time reader. I'll definitely re-read at some point, though.
scarletpeaches is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 03:53 PM   #7
kuwisdelu
there is always hope
 
kuwisdelu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: W. Lafayette, IN
Posts: 29,973
kuwisdelu is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentskuwisdelu is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentskuwisdelu is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentskuwisdelu is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentskuwisdelu is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentskuwisdelu is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentskuwisdelu is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentskuwisdelu is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentskuwisdelu is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentskuwisdelu is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentskuwisdelu is so great that we've run out of appropriate compliments
Why can't it be a love story from the perspective of a monster? I don't see anything mutually exclusive about the two. Love isn't always healthy. I do think Lo played a large part in their relationship, but I don't believe she ever loved HH. I certainly think HH had strong feelings for Lo, though. The way I read it, they both took advantage of each other, with devastating consequences for both. How much blame is to be distributed to each depends on how much faith we give to Humbert the Narrator's version of events. I don't disagree that he's unreliable, but I don't believe Lo is entirely innocent, either.
__________________
(a blog.) ...last updated 28 April 2014

Last edited by kuwisdelu; 06-03-2011 at 03:58 PM.
kuwisdelu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2012, 10:24 PM   #8
Lady Ice
Makes useful distinctions
 
Lady Ice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,573
Lady Ice should run for PresidentLady Ice should run for PresidentLady Ice should run for PresidentLady Ice should run for PresidentLady Ice should run for PresidentLady Ice should run for President
I think the OP has a good point. Lolita is an elusive novel: just compare the two movies it spawned. Kubrick's movie is a black comedy; Lyne's movie is a tragedy. We can judge Humbert in the sense that he is a self-proclaimed paedophile and so is amoral, but it's never clear how much he regrets his actions. Lolita is not entirely literal.
__________________
"We work in the dark--we do what we can--we give what we have. Our doubt is our passion and our passion is our task. The rest is the madness of art." (Henry James)

"Either you think--or else others have to think for you and take power from you, pervert and discipline your natural tastes, civilize and sterilize you." (Tender is The Night)

http://stagebystage.weebly.com/
Lady Ice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 12:58 PM   #9
Jake.C
Assume the best intentions.
 
Jake.C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 208
Jake.C is on a distinguished road
One of my English teachers read this novel and ended up thinking H.H was the good guy and Lo the bad guy. I've never understood this reading; I just don't see how anyone could read the story and perceive Lo's actions (even reported unreliably as they are) as anything but innocent. Anybody who has seen a young female interact with an older male whom she has a little crush on knows that Lo did not act out of the ordinary--as a 'nymphet'. All the little gestures that H. tries to pass off as the exclusive motions of a temptress are normal flirtations that I've seen young girls experiment with before. (Males who had friends with younger sisters when they were teenagers might be more familiar).

And anyone who tries to pass of her deception of H. as evidence of cruelty or deviousness are forgetting what she was going through in his care. I don't think she ever behaved out of turn.
__________________
You can always count on a murderer for a fancy prose style.
Jake.C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2012, 12:56 AM   #10
Nostro
practical experience, FTW
 
Nostro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Ireland
Posts: 114
Nostro is on a distinguished road
I'm only about 50 pages into the book so I'm not entirely qualified to post. I'd agree with those who say Lo is blameless, she's a kid with a childish crush on an older man. A man who takes advantage of the father figure shaped hole in her life.

The contrast between HH's beautiful writing and his despicable actions is breath taking. As to the original question in the op, I'd question why HH wanted his memoirs published posthumously. Imo he wants to clear his name, and believes his writing is seductive enough to do so. His continuous references to men who have taken child brides throughout history would support this. Also his manipulation of psychiatrists is a classic example of sociopathy (sociopaths appear to be immune to psychotherapy). Manipulation is second nature for sociopaths. I'd wonder if Nabokov knew of this and inserted it as a hint to HH's true nature.

I'm not sure how anyone could read it as a love story, unless it was as a forbidden/taboo love story. Lionel Trilling seemed to see it that way (there's an interesting discussion of the book between the two on youtube). But still!
Nostro is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Custom Search

If this site is helpful to you,
Please consider a voluntary subscription to defray ongoing expenses.

Buy Scrivener 2 for Mac OS X (Regular Licence)


All times are GMT +4.5. The time now is 04:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.