Read Books By AWers!

Welcome to the AbsoluteWrite Water Cooler! Please read The Newbie Guide To Absolute Write

editing for authors ad

A publisher or agency using Google ads to solicit your novel probably isn't anyone you want to write for.


Go Back   Absolute Write Water Cooler > Publishing > General Publishing Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-22-2011, 02:39 AM   #1
Kurlumbenus
practical experience, FTW
 
Kurlumbenus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 252
Kurlumbenus is on a distinguished road
Question Pen Names vs One Name for e-publishing

I'm a fairly prolific guy who writes across a broad swath of genre. Conventional traditional publishing wisdom tells us that we must invent new pen names when writing in a new genre, lest the poor and easily mislead reader find disappointment when discovering that our existential horror opus is somehow differently written than the wainscot fantasy that they're used to. Disenchanted, they will avoid taking chances on your work ever again.

The matter is different in e-publishing, where your backlog is your greatest marketing tool. Ebooks can easily and conveniently link readers to other similar works, and thus act as affiliates in the process. The bigger a writer's library, the more entry points to his body of work are available to potential fans.

Where is the balance point between the exposure that a wide library can offer, and the dangers of brand diffusion with too many genres stuffed under one pen-name? Is each genre and subgenre better off as a separate author entity, or can we take a broader approach? Can an author's pen names link to one another's work, or will that confuse and annoy the readership?
Kurlumbenus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2011, 02:57 AM   #2
Bubastes
bananaed
 
Bubastes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: oontz oontz oontz oontz
Posts: 7,238
Bubastes is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsBubastes is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsBubastes is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsBubastes is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsBubastes is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsBubastes is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsBubastes is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsBubastes is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsBubastes is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsBubastes is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsBubastes is so great that we've run out of appropriate compliments
I don't know the answer, but here's an interesting blog post by Gini Koch on her reasons for using so many pen names for her books:

http://musapublishing.blogspot.com/2...gini-koch.html
__________________
Do what you can, with what you have, where you are. -- Theodore Roosevelt

Website | Twitter
Bubastes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2011, 03:40 AM   #3
Kurlumbenus
practical experience, FTW
 
Kurlumbenus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 252
Kurlumbenus is on a distinguished road
Interesting read! Not all of that applies as-is to e-publishing, of course, but still a lot of valid points.
Kurlumbenus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2011, 01:53 PM   #4
shaldna
The cake is a lie. But still cake.
 
shaldna's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Belfast
Posts: 7,371
shaldna is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsshaldna is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsshaldna is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsshaldna is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsshaldna is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsshaldna is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsshaldna is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsshaldna is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsshaldna is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsshaldna is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsshaldna is so great that we've run out of appropriate compliments
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurlumbenus View Post
Conventional traditional publishing wisdom tells us that we must invent new pen names when writing in a new genre, lest the poor and easily mislead reader find disappointment when discovering that our existential horror opus is somehow differently written than the wainscot fantasy that they're used to. Disenchanted, they will avoid taking chances on your work ever again.
I dont' think you need a new pen name for every genre. But I think grouping genres is more sensible. For instance, if you write horror and sci-fi then you can probably group them together. But if you write horror and chick lit then you'll probably want different pen names.

Quote:
The matter is different in e-publishing, where your backlog is your greatest marketing tool. Ebooks can easily and conveniently link readers to other similar works, and thus act as affiliates in the process. The bigger a writer's library, the more entry points to his body of work are available to potential fans.
Bolding mine. See my point above about grouping genres.

Quote:
Can an author's pen names link to one another's work, or will that confuse and annoy the readership?
I read a lot of authors who write with different pen names, I know this and I read several of them, but, for instance, If I know that Annie Author writes fantasy, but uses the name Jenny Author to write westerns, then I will know what to expect when I pick up Jenny Author, or Annie Author, and I won't feel mislead.

If I like Annie Author enough, even if I dont' generally like westerns, I may pick up on of Jenny Author's books, just to see what they are like.
__________________
TORCHWOOD - where the slash is canon

Yes, I read Twilight. Yes, I hate it. No, I don't have to give you a reason why.


Here be snark : www.clairewriteswords.wordpress.com
shaldna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2011, 06:34 PM   #5
Irysangel
She of Many Names
 
Irysangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,705
Irysangel is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsIrysangel is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsIrysangel is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsIrysangel is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsIrysangel is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsIrysangel is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsIrysangel is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsIrysangel is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsIrysangel is so great that we've run out of appropriate compliments
I vote that you go with one name. As a writer, having 3 names is a total pain in the butt. As a reader, I gravitate toward authors I know and 'trust' and if you're self-publishing, the genre isn't as important as much as it needs to feel like one of 'your' books, if that makes sense.
__________________
The Girl's Guide to (Man)Hunting - Available May 1, 2012. Amazon | B&N |Goodreads

www.jessica-sims.com
www.jillmyles.com
http://jessica-clare.com
Irysangel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 12:50 AM   #6
Kurlumbenus
practical experience, FTW
 
Kurlumbenus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 252
Kurlumbenus is on a distinguished road
No, I get it. I do have some variation in voice depending on what I'm writing, though... I tend towards the dark and fantastic (not necessarily fantasy) most of the time.
Kurlumbenus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2011, 06:37 AM   #7
Silver-Midnight
"We're all mad here" - Cheshire Cat
 
Silver-Midnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Falling into her own Wonderland
Posts: 4,910
Silver-Midnight has a golden reputationSilver-Midnight has a golden reputationSilver-Midnight has a golden reputationSilver-Midnight has a golden reputationSilver-Midnight has a golden reputationSilver-Midnight has a golden reputation
I think you would be fine using just one name. I say that simply because you've already got a fan base, I'm guessing, and so, you wouldn't have to go through the difficult task of picking one back up again.
Silver-Midnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2011, 03:04 PM   #8
Keyan
ubiquitous
 
Keyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,824
Keyan has earned our admirationKeyan has earned our admirationKeyan has earned our admirationKeyan has earned our admiration
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irysangel View Post
I vote that you go with one name. As a writer, having 3 names is a total pain in the butt. As a reader, I gravitate toward authors I know and 'trust' and if you're self-publishing, the genre isn't as important as much as it needs to feel like one of 'your' books, if that makes sense.
I'd respectfully disagree. I read in several genres, but the authors I read also write outside them. I'd be very annoyed to discover something I expected to be an upbeat fantasy adventure turned out to be dystopian drama from hell. Even if both novels were really well-written.
Keyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2011, 03:20 PM   #9
Keyan
ubiquitous
 
Keyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,824
Keyan has earned our admirationKeyan has earned our admirationKeyan has earned our admirationKeyan has earned our admiration
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurlumbenus View Post
I'm a fairly prolific guy who writes across a broad swath of genre. Conventional traditional publishing wisdom tells us that we must invent new pen names when writing in a new genre, lest the poor and easily mislead reader find disappointment when discovering that our existential horror opus is somehow differently written than the wainscot fantasy that they're used to. Disenchanted, they will avoid taking chances on your work ever again.

The matter is different in e-publishing, where your backlog is your greatest marketing tool. Ebooks can easily and conveniently link readers to other similar works, and thus act as affiliates in the process. The bigger a writer's library, the more entry points to his body of work are available to potential fans.

Where is the balance point between the exposure that a wide library can offer, and the dangers of brand diffusion with too many genres stuffed under one pen-name? Is each genre and subgenre better off as a separate author entity, or can we take a broader approach? Can an author's pen names link to one another's work, or will that confuse and annoy the readership?
I think the answer to this is whether you expect the books to appeal to the same audience. An author's name is a brand.

I would be that disenchanted reader... all it takes is one really unpleasant reading experience for me to shelve the author as someone whose tastes don't align with mine. (After all, if something's been read, it can't be *unread*.)
Whereas if he were writing grim gory horror as Author A and light fantasy as Mr B, and cozy mysteries as Ms D, I would be perfectly content to read only the genres that interested me.

It's not that it's 'differently written' - it's that it's differently experienced by the reader. My concern is not that I'll find a book boring. There's a delete button for that. It's that I will waste time and energy on a book that actively annoys me and forms a "mindworm" (like an earworm, but worse).
Keyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2011, 06:07 PM   #10
Irysangel
She of Many Names
 
Irysangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,705
Irysangel is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsIrysangel is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsIrysangel is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsIrysangel is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsIrysangel is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsIrysangel is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsIrysangel is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsIrysangel is so great that we've run out of appropriate complimentsIrysangel is so great that we've run out of appropriate compliments
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keyan View Post
I'd respectfully disagree. I read in several genres, but the authors I read also write outside them. I'd be very annoyed to discover something I expected to be an upbeat fantasy adventure turned out to be dystopian drama from hell. Even if both novels were really well-written.
But that's what packaging and a blurb does - it tells the reader what to expect. Anyhow, multiple pen names might be exactly what the OP wants. I was just speaking from my experience.
__________________
The Girl's Guide to (Man)Hunting - Available May 1, 2012. Amazon | B&N |Goodreads

www.jessica-sims.com
www.jillmyles.com
http://jessica-clare.com
Irysangel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2011, 09:49 PM   #11
movieman
practical experience, FTW
 
movieman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada (ex-UK)
Posts: 707
movieman is well-respected
There was a thread on another forum recently about authors who write both young adult and erotica, and how they probably want to use two names so the erotica is less likely to show up on the 'also bought' or 'also viewed' for their young adult books. So there clearly are some good reasons for using different names.
__________________

movieman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 05:46 AM   #12
John R. Gambit
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 83
John R. Gambit is on a distinguished road
I would recommend sticking with one name, barring extreme circumstances like movieman mentioned.
John R. Gambit is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Custom Search

If this site is helpful to you,
Please consider a voluntary subscription to defray ongoing expenses.

Buy Scrivener 2 for Mac OS X (Regular Licence)


All times are GMT +4.5. The time now is 09:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.