In the past, I've posted mainly in Basic "Writing", "Novels" and SYW.
As I explain briefly below, I'm now planning and doing research for what at first glance might be an historical novel...but might be a standard mainstream.
What follows is a very brief extract from my post today in "Novels". I know it's vague.
============
In various forms, I've been working on my current WIP over the years, and intensely for about the last 6 months. This morning I junked it. What a relief!!!!
Writing shapes up again as being interesting. I was also able to hit on my next novel topic, or perhaps even a series -- I'll wait and see.
I plan to write a fictional inter-generational family story based on (but not an exact chronological study) my own family. I completed the research several years ago, but I've had a blind spot as far as writing this went.
The period of the story runs approximately from the Irish Rebellion in the late 1700s, to the convict settlement in Sydney and elsewhere in Australia, until the roughly 1923.
I have 9 ancestors transported from the UK to Australia in the 18th century. All have interesting stories to tell. Some members of subsequent generations also had interesting lives. So I asked myself, why not use this as source material for a novel?
I suppose most writing can have elements of historicity, but this will be my first for including so much "real" history told as fiction. So, I'm excited about this project.
And it's back to researching how to write historical-type novels.
=============
Significant historical research confirms that this might well justify a multi-volume story. That thought doesn't bother me. I've written several stories 100,000+ words.
These are what I would really appreciate comments on:
1. I've never written historical-based stories. Any pit-falls to took for?
2. I've never written multi-volume works before. Obvious, to my inexperienced mind, it seems that planning, outlining and linking the volumes is important. Any guidelines you might care to offer?
3. I plan to base my story on my ancestors, not necessarily make my ancestors major characters. No reason other than until I prove otherwise to myself, I believe I'll get a stronger and more interesting story, if I stick to incontestable facts in which I place characters based on my ancestors. Any comments on the wisdom or otherwise of adopting this approach?
4. Is there such a thing as a "standard" length of an historical-type novel?
5. Finally, is this even the right forum in which I should post?
As I explain briefly below, I'm now planning and doing research for what at first glance might be an historical novel...but might be a standard mainstream.
What follows is a very brief extract from my post today in "Novels". I know it's vague.
============
In various forms, I've been working on my current WIP over the years, and intensely for about the last 6 months. This morning I junked it. What a relief!!!!
Writing shapes up again as being interesting. I was also able to hit on my next novel topic, or perhaps even a series -- I'll wait and see.
I plan to write a fictional inter-generational family story based on (but not an exact chronological study) my own family. I completed the research several years ago, but I've had a blind spot as far as writing this went.
The period of the story runs approximately from the Irish Rebellion in the late 1700s, to the convict settlement in Sydney and elsewhere in Australia, until the roughly 1923.
I have 9 ancestors transported from the UK to Australia in the 18th century. All have interesting stories to tell. Some members of subsequent generations also had interesting lives. So I asked myself, why not use this as source material for a novel?
I suppose most writing can have elements of historicity, but this will be my first for including so much "real" history told as fiction. So, I'm excited about this project.
And it's back to researching how to write historical-type novels.
=============
Significant historical research confirms that this might well justify a multi-volume story. That thought doesn't bother me. I've written several stories 100,000+ words.
These are what I would really appreciate comments on:
1. I've never written historical-based stories. Any pit-falls to took for?
2. I've never written multi-volume works before. Obvious, to my inexperienced mind, it seems that planning, outlining and linking the volumes is important. Any guidelines you might care to offer?
3. I plan to base my story on my ancestors, not necessarily make my ancestors major characters. No reason other than until I prove otherwise to myself, I believe I'll get a stronger and more interesting story, if I stick to incontestable facts in which I place characters based on my ancestors. Any comments on the wisdom or otherwise of adopting this approach?
4. Is there such a thing as a "standard" length of an historical-type novel?
5. Finally, is this even the right forum in which I should post?

