FOTSGreg--my reply was directed at
blakers81. His questions were valid; I asked them myself back in the day.
No one here is an idiot, nor did I use that word in my post. I reserve that appellation/definition exclusively for the greedsters who run PublishAmerica, not for fellow writers.
I'm glad you're following Selena's advice. She's a damned smart publisher and editor (and one of my drinkin' buddies) and I have nothing but respect for her. I almost went to Connestoga this weekend, but I had to write. Guess I'll see my Oklahoma buds at SoonerCon this summer if things go well.
I say if the reason you're writing is because you want to make money, stop writing.
I write for money.
I finally got off my arse and finished my first novel because I wanted to money buy a used car. Which I did. Later, I made enough to buy a new car. Later still, I made enough for the down payment on my house.
This year I hope to make enough to pay off my house.
But I'd write anyway.
It's better to get
paid for it.
Yes, most pros don't make a lot of money at it and keep their day jobs, but I do pretty well for a mid-lister. I
should have a day job--at least I'd have health insurance and a regular check. Bad me, no cookie.
reader comments, even the negative ones, beat the pants off form rejections any day.
Yes, getting reader comments is better than collecting rejections, but rejections made me work harder at my craft until it was up to a commercial level. I still get reader comments, and they still feel good, but they feel better when I have money in the bank.
The picture IS dim for self-publishing--that's the unvarnished reality for the majority who try it. Selling 30-40 copies
is a success--compared to the countless neos who sell ZERO copies.
I count myself extraordinarily lucky to have sold almost 500 copies. The
only reason I got away with so many is that I figured that .1% of my hard-core fans *might* buy a copy of that title. (I based the numbers on visitors to my website who stayed longer than 30 minutes.)
Since a new writer usually has no fan base, then self-publishing is much more likely to be a disappointing learning experience.
In the case of uploading a book at no cost to some of the venues available, a new writer won't be out of pocket as I was, but people have to hear about a book first, and again, the new writer hits that big nasty wall of "No one knows who you are and no one cares that you wrote a book."
Heck, I get that all the time for my pro titles!
Add in the stigma of "If you're such a good writer and this is such a good story, why couldn't you sell it to a publisher?" and a neo is in for a world of hurt. I'd rather have a rejection letter.
Established as I am in my genre, I STILL got that attitude for my self-pub title. Some even thought it was a trunk book written when I was a teen that I couldn't unload.
As for "the general public," maybe a few can't tell the dif between pro and self-pub or they don't care, but the rest are
very aware of it and they don't buy. Otherwise, sales would be a lot better for self-pubs. I see the shift in them. They act like a self-pub is radioactive, even when it's on the same table next to my pro titles.
While others have had some success at self-pubbing and perhaps all they want is a book in hand and to sell a few copies, that was never an option for me.
I wanted my books in the stores to be read by thousands, not just a few friends or (horrors) snagging pity buys in a dealer's room. I've seen it.
While online sellers will carry a self-pub title, the majority of bookstores are not going to stock them. Neos to this venue need to understand that important fact. It tends to get buried under upbeat enthusiasm and the idea that "If it gets in print and on the 'Net it will sell!" No, it does not.
Not everyone is going to luck out like Christopher Paolini. He had a huge boost with his parents full support and used Lighting Source but
after two years of promotion and crappy sales, he was ready to give up. If a pro writer Carl Hiaasen had taken his stepson to the zoo that day instead of a bookstore where Paolini was signing, we'd never have heard of
Eragon.
I do see a lot of shiny-eyed kids thinking they can do the same thing with their epic fantasy. They're into the easy-to-grasp legend of a young writer's success, rather than the thorny facts. I'll hand them the facts every single time, even if they choose not to listen.
I've a friend who self-pubbed and promotes herself very successfully, but she went into it full well knowing the kind of stigma and expenses she would face. "Grace under fire" is my best description for how she's dealt with it over the years. I respect and admire her and we kvetch about writing at conventions.
She does a better job at promoting than I do, and now has a number of professional credits under her belt. Those books are in the stores, but I've yet to see her self-pub titles there.
Will I self-publish again? Absolutely yes. I have a collection of short stories to re-issue, and I plan to do a novel that I know will not have a home in any commercial house, but will sell at least 500 copies from my website.
Do I recommend it as a venue for a new writer? Never. Start at the top and don't take no for an answer.
.