- Joined
- Mar 13, 2007
- Messages
- 2,658
- Reaction score
- 1,317
- Location
- Florida
- Website
- thoughtsfromthecave.blogspot.com
I'm glad I use a pen name there. I had a tree article approved there but the CE went and changed around all of my Latin names so they weren't in parentheses (I think that reads better than extra commas, and it's how I usually see it in the garden world. Read in the forums there how many do it that way too) and messed around with the variety names so they were in double quotes, not the single quotes used by botanists.
It made it more complicated by saying Canada Red Chokecherry, Prunus virginiana known as "Canada Red," when all you really need is (Prunus virginiana 'Canada Red'). And it would be one thing if they phrased it that way all the time, but they didn't.
It's approved so whatever, but it's not something I would want to put my real name on now as a garden writer.
I always put the Latin names in parentheses and haven't had a problem yet. I agree, I think it looks more professional and reads better. I'm not sure all of the CE's are really gardeners. Just because you planted a petunia once in your yard, does not make a gardener.
As far as the CE gripes, most of mine are always good and professional, though I did have one last week that gave me a rewrite because they didn't believe the area I was writing about has 1000 lakes in it. I gave three references, but I think they were too lazy to read them. I directed them to the exact statement, wrote a note I try to give facts and not just add random stuff that is not true. I could have read nasty into the words that wasn't meant to be there, but I was taken back. My article did go through with a a note from the CE that their job was to check facts, which I completely understand, but I did feel like I was being called a liar. Rant over.