Like the title of the post says. Where do you draw the line on naughty/bad/dangerous behavior in your writing? Specifically bad behavior that the character gets away with, specifically in middle grade stuff. To write a decent MG novel, your characters usually have to do a fair amount of rule-breaking--staying out too late, going places they aren't supposed to go, wielding magical swords, losing their younger siblings, etc.
In the story I'm working on now, the MC leaves town without telling his mom, who is very laid back. He gets into a bit of trouble and scares himself by doing so, so minor consequences. He gets rides with strangers in an emergency situation, and there are no negative consequences. I'm kind of questioning how okay this is. I had another scene where a trusted adult told some kids, "Don't tell any of the grownups that..." but I had an extreme attack of conscience and changed it to "Don't tell anyone that...because I want to tell them myself in a few days."
In some books (like Horrid Henry or Wimpy Kid for instance), the kid gleefully does bad stuff but it's made clear that the kid is a terrible role model. Those books are okay, but they aren't for everybody. My MIL teaches very troubled foster kids, and she agreed that she can't teach with books like that, because they're too confusing for a kid already struggling with concepts of right and wrong. But I'm derailing my own thread, so I'll stop
Anyways: kidlit writers, how do you choose where to draw the line?
In the story I'm working on now, the MC leaves town without telling his mom, who is very laid back. He gets into a bit of trouble and scares himself by doing so, so minor consequences. He gets rides with strangers in an emergency situation, and there are no negative consequences. I'm kind of questioning how okay this is. I had another scene where a trusted adult told some kids, "Don't tell any of the grownups that..." but I had an extreme attack of conscience and changed it to "Don't tell anyone that...because I want to tell them myself in a few days."
In some books (like Horrid Henry or Wimpy Kid for instance), the kid gleefully does bad stuff but it's made clear that the kid is a terrible role model. Those books are okay, but they aren't for everybody. My MIL teaches very troubled foster kids, and she agreed that she can't teach with books like that, because they're too confusing for a kid already struggling with concepts of right and wrong. But I'm derailing my own thread, so I'll stop
Anyways: kidlit writers, how do you choose where to draw the line?