How do YOU know if your writing stinks?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Angelinity

absent
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
2,765
Reaction score
1,059
When it all boils down, shouldn't we write because we like it? If someone else likes it, great! If that person is an agent, even better! A publisher? Very exiciting! 10 million people across the world reading your work translated in 14 languages? Well spank my ass and call me Shirley!

But whether that comes or not, it should't really effect WHY you write. Besides, there's always going to be at least one person out there who thinks your shit stinks. Inevitable.

Being published is of course meaningful recognition. I guess my quandary stems from wanting to write a 'really good' book.

Every time i read a really good book, I am humbled. Is it really worth writing at all, unless one can produce something of unquestionable quality?
 

DonnaDuck

My Worlds Are Building
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
2,883
Reaction score
294
Age
43
Location
Arizona
Website
www.imaginewrite.net
"Good" is not a blanket term. Some people's gold might be another's poo pile. Tastes are broad so while I see something as good, others may not. The solution is to just write.
 

HorsebackWriter

Dream at a gallop!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 24, 2008
Messages
775
Reaction score
142
Location
Meanwhile, back at the ranch ...
Imho, it's *definitely* worth writing regardless of the quality -- you can write because it's a part of you, and a part of who you are.

Plus, just like with muscle memory in gymnastics or in playing musical instruments, for two examples, there is also muscle memory in the brain. In life, and over time, if you do something long enough and hard enough, you may actually find you are brilliant, and not because you were born with a talent or because it comes easy to you, but because of dedication and hard work.

I believe there are two paths toward anything in life: talent, and hard work. Persistence is needed with both. The extent the two mix can make it easier or harder in ones chosen endeavor, but even so, no well-written piece comes to life without persistence.

Not to toot my own horn here, but to make a point -- my writing is only good now, at 42 years old, and only ready now for me to be putting out there in the world. I wrote like a fiend all these years, but I knew in my twenties (and in my disappointed heart) that my writing wasn't quite there yet. But, I wrote because I was a writer, no matter the quality of my work.

Twenty years later, I can even impress myself, sometimes. It took the long road for me, writing-wise, but even the "long road" is valid.

Looking back, there are three things about me that haven't changed all my life: pink, my favorite color, my love of spaghetti and meatballs, and writing. In this constantly head-spinning and changing world, I highly value those three things.

Whether I was good or not (yet) wasn't part of the equation when it came to writing. Just like anything else, you keep working at it, and working at bringing about those things that mean the most to you.

Em


ANGELINITY wrote:

I guess my quandary stems from wanting to write a 'really good' book.

Every time i read a really good book, I am humbled. Is it really worth writing at all, unless one can produce something of unquestionable quality?[/quote]
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.