Criminal investigators in literary suspense?

KikiteNeko

.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
2,380
Reaction score
1,616
I need some advice. Right now I'm working on a literary story with some suspense elements, and I'm new to writing anything in the suspense genre. The story is about a young girl who gets taken from her home. The story is told in the third person, divided up between the young girl and members of the neighborhood who are searching for her.

I have a lot of key characters, like the girl, her kidnapper, and the family and one or two important neighbors. I don't want to clutter up the plot by inserting a police investigator with a back story. I don't want my readers to CARE about the investigator. As this investigator interviews the neighbors and moves through leads, I want my readers to be focused entirely on the people he's interviewing.

So my solution was to call this investigator "The man" or sometimes "The man with the pad."

My question is, how important do you think the back story of an investigator in a kidnapping case is? Would you accept it if an author chose to make him insignificant if there were stronger characters making up the story?
 

Cranky

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
14,945
Reaction score
8,145
I would. I would also not write from his POV at all. Third person or not. It must be written from the characters point of view, I think.

As an added bonus, seeing the investigator solely from the witness's POV is another chance to build those characters up, and gain some insight into their state of mind, or even what kind of person those characters are.

For example, the mother could view him as either a savior, or as like some sort of scarecrow that reminds her of her missing child. Everything he says or does could be filtered through her perceptions. Then, you get a feel for the mom's state of mind, and what she thinks about the whole situation in a less "telly" sort of way.

My two cents.
 

stc

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 1, 2007
Messages
178
Reaction score
27
Have you seen Citizen Kane?

Sounds like your investigator = Thompson, CK's journalist. No backstory whatsoever. He's more a function than a character, an audience surrogate providing a portal into and continuous thread though the story.
 

KikiteNeko

.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
2,380
Reaction score
1,616
Didn't see it. How'd it work out?

Have you seen Citizen Kane?

Sounds like your investigator = Thompson, CK's journalist. No backstory whatsoever. He's more a function than a character, an audience surrogate providing a portal into and continuous thread though the story.
 

Will Lavender

Everything is what it seems.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
1,801
Reaction score
355
Location
Louisville, KY
I don't mind it at all.

HOWEVER, I don't like either of your names for him.

He is, technically, not just a "man." He's a cop or an inspector or a policeman or a detective or an investigator. His title takes precedent here.

And "the man with the pad" is too bizarre. Don't use that.
 

RJK

Sheriff Bullwinkle the Poet says:
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
3,415
Reaction score
440
Location
Lewiston, NY
I may be a little late chiming in here, but there was an excellent episode of Without a Trace a while back, where they told the story from the victim's family's POV. It showed how intrusive the investigators appeared to be. How they intruded into the familiy's personal lives.
You could do a lot, looking at it from that POV.
 

Soccer Mom

Crypto-fascist
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
18,604
Reaction score
8,039
Location
Under your couch
I would simply call him "the detective". It's neutral enough, but "man with the pad" or some such thing seems too deliberately obtuse. It would have the opposite effect of making me focus on him to look for clues. You want him to be invisible.