Synopsis for Historical fiction

Status
Not open for further replies.

Diviner

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
602
Reaction score
91
Location
California
Should the synopsis for historical fiction draw readers' attention to real historical characters (by writing them in bold or something) or just assume knowledge on the part of the reader? Or does it not matter?
 

Mumut

Well begun is half done...
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
3,371
Reaction score
400
Location
Brisbane, Australia
If it matters to the story, I'd include them as just part of the synopsis. I mention that the setting was in the first ten years of Hundred Year War. The Pope was in Avignon, not Rome. I wouldn't highlight them.
 

Puma

Retired and loving it!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 21, 2006
Messages
7,340
Reaction score
1,540
Location
Central Ohio
From what I understand, the main characters names should be bolded the first time they appear in the synopsis. If the historical figures are main characters, they should be in bold; if they aren't, then no. Puma
 

pdr

Banned
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
4,259
Reaction score
832
Location
Home - but for how long?
Synopsis

There is no difference between the synopsis for the historical novel and any other novel.

Just follow the usual publishing or what the specific editor asks for format
 

DeleyanLee

Writing Anarchist
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 6, 2007
Messages
31,667
Reaction score
11,425
Location
lost among the words
From what I understand, the main characters names should be bolded the first time they appear in the synopsis. If the historical figures are main characters, they should be in bold; if they aren't, then no. Puma

FWIW, that's standard in screenwriting (IIRC, so the producer can easily count up the cast list), but it's not standard in novel synopses that I've been aware of. At least, in 30 years of submissions, I've never been dinged because I haven't done it. *shrug*
 

ishtar'sgate

living in the past
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
465
Location
Canada
Website
www.linneaheinrichs.com
Should the synopsis for historical fiction draw readers' attention to real historical characters (by writing them in bold or something) or just assume knowledge on the part of the reader? Or does it not matter?
If they only make cameo appearances and don't figure as main characters then you don't need to mention them at all. Generally speaking, if an agent represents historicals and knows the time period of your novel, he/she will also be familiar with the real historical characters of that time. As previously said, first mention of your main characters is usually given in bold simply as a guide for keeping track of the number of players.
Linnea
 
Status
Not open for further replies.