Should the synopsis for historical fiction draw readers' attention to real historical characters (by writing them in bold or something) or just assume knowledge on the part of the reader? Or does it not matter?
From what I understand, the main characters names should be bolded the first time they appear in the synopsis. If the historical figures are main characters, they should be in bold; if they aren't, then no. Puma
If they only make cameo appearances and don't figure as main characters then you don't need to mention them at all. Generally speaking, if an agent represents historicals and knows the time period of your novel, he/she will also be familiar with the real historical characters of that time. As previously said, first mention of your main characters is usually given in bold simply as a guide for keeping track of the number of players.Should the synopsis for historical fiction draw readers' attention to real historical characters (by writing them in bold or something) or just assume knowledge on the part of the reader? Or does it not matter?