Short fictions are great. They enable you to experiment with ideas and to challenge your mind. Are there any AW members who prefere to write short fiction rather than Novels, and why?
I suspect there are loads. It's pretty much instant gratification. For people like me who just started out, it's good to have quickly have a finished product to show.
Count me in that number! I like to see the story down on paper fast and I can usually think of a storyline easier for short fiction than for long. I am especially finding myself enjoying the grabble length works I've been doing.
I love both writing and reading bite-sized fiction. I gravitate more and more to the shortest of shorts. I still write novel length works, but short fiction lets me explore worlds outside the confines of my novel. See, I write novels mostly for children, but I enjoy playing with more adult themes in my short works. Flash is my Busman's Holiday.
Psst: and like Mike said, we're doing a Flash A Day (FAD) challenge right now. Click the March FADness in my siggy line if you want to read the daily prompts.
I'm a fan of writing short fiction. It's a great way to experiment without sinking huge amounts of time into a single project. Yeah, I'm a commitment-phobe.
I also love reading short fiction because I tend to read entire novels in a single sitting. Short stories give me my reading fix without cutting into my sleep time.
So what? They may be harder to sell, but at least you'd have the satisfaction of knowing you CAN write something longer and if you can't sell it, you can podcast or selfpublish to get it out.I'm not verbose enough or good enough at plots to write a novel.
No, really. I'm trying my hand at a novel right now. I have nearly a third of the story down, and I haven't even broken 10K. It's kind of sad, really. It might wind up being a novella if I'm not careful.
I'm not verbose enough or good enough at plots to write a novel.
No, really. I'm trying my hand at a novel right now. I have nearly a third of the story down, and I haven't even broken 10K. It's kind of sad, really. It might wind up being a novella if I'm not careful.
I came up with a story that wanted to be novel, once. I even managed to write it (40K when I was done).
Only, a lot of it was filler.
35K of it was filler.
...
Sad, but every time I manage to write a novel (a year and half's worth of work, usually), I find out one way or another that it should have been a short. It just makes me more leary of writing anything BUT shorts.
Which is funny, since I write short stories and I usually get at least one beta reader that asks "Do you want to make this a novel?"
Eesh.
I've toyed with both, but find myself gravitating closer to short fiction. Honestly, novels and short fiction require very different skill sets. A novel is not a long short story, and a short story is not a tiny novel.
I guess it all comes down to personal preference - there are plenty of authors who can write both, but I believe it a mistake to approach short fiction merely as a "stepping stone" to writing novels. There are no absolutes in writing, but in short fiction one of your most valuable skills is economy of words - creating a complete story, the most interesting thing to ever happen to your characters - in as few words as possible. Elegance in short fiction is writing exactly what you have to, nothing more, and nothing less.
If you let short stories shape your voice then it may actually hamper you if you intend to move on to writing longer works. Imagine an artist who'd spent his formative years painting wonderful scenes on 6x8 index cards. Now give him a 16x22 canvas - he won't know what to do with all that space.
Writing is a similar thing. If you start with novels, you'll need to learn to tell as complete a story in a much smaller space. If you start with short fiction, you'll have to learn to fill a much larger space - to add more detail, more depth - from the planning stage on.