Prompted by the very interesting threads here on male vs female writers and what's at the heart of a romance, I'm curious about another aspect. And please forgive me in advance if I'm not entirely clear--I'm hacking through a head cold and my thought processes aren't as smooth as they could be! <g>
Sometimes, in the middle of an otherwise very good book, I'm ripped out of the flow when a character, whose gender is the opposite of the author's, behaves in a way that seems entirely contrary to their sex. For example, a love scene in the hero's deep POV which is full of flowery images that, IMO (and, of course, this is all MO lol), most men, romantics or not, would never think, let alone say.
As a result, I go to great lengths to make my male characters as 'real' as possible -- in other words, I use several male betas with radically different romantic outlooks to comment on the hero in particular, and to point out areas where, for lack of a better way to describe it, he crosses the line and behaves or speaks too much like a woman in a man's skin.
My curiousity then comes down to this: We can't deny that men and women approach and think about love and sex from very different angles. How much effort do you put into creating those very real separations? How difficult (or not) do you find it to step outside of your gender and *honestly* create a portrait of the opposite sex? And either way, what do you find are the most confusing/hard to capture elements?
Sometimes, in the middle of an otherwise very good book, I'm ripped out of the flow when a character, whose gender is the opposite of the author's, behaves in a way that seems entirely contrary to their sex. For example, a love scene in the hero's deep POV which is full of flowery images that, IMO (and, of course, this is all MO lol), most men, romantics or not, would never think, let alone say.
As a result, I go to great lengths to make my male characters as 'real' as possible -- in other words, I use several male betas with radically different romantic outlooks to comment on the hero in particular, and to point out areas where, for lack of a better way to describe it, he crosses the line and behaves or speaks too much like a woman in a man's skin.
My curiousity then comes down to this: We can't deny that men and women approach and think about love and sex from very different angles. How much effort do you put into creating those very real separations? How difficult (or not) do you find it to step outside of your gender and *honestly* create a portrait of the opposite sex? And either way, what do you find are the most confusing/hard to capture elements?
