Of course it's possible that my book may be crap, but I know many people who are sick of the general way books are going these days. I know books have to be exciting and all, but it's as if people try too hard and it comes across as fake. As it is, in terms of fiction, I can hardly believe a single thing I read, hence I cannot take it seriously or enjoy it or, indeed, derive any meaning or fulfillment from it. Yes that's a sweeping generalisation and some books will of course not apply, but it's not just my opinion. However, what is published nowadays is what the elite houses of London seem to like nowadays, when I believe there should be something else out there, but there is not. There's no need for writers, obviously avid readers, to insult some one who does not tend to read. I'm not asking you to get the book out of your face.
I'm just tired of the synopsis and book, that's all.
Some one told me to include the emotional journey, but now some one else is giving a firm no.
The book is indeed geared to those who wouldn't normally read, yes, and I hope this one might change it. (Queue the "no way!!"s)
I am aware that a QL is not a mss, that's why I do often query beforehand, so as to make the mss submission (if requested) solicited, as I did with Random House. I do agree about the strangeness of the submission, first chapter and nothing else, but if they do request more, then it will surely include the synopsis, and I guess I have to knuckle down and do it tomorrow. It's just I don't know where to put the emotional journey/character development/setting/dialogue, as you can't (apart from the former) really see that unless you actually read the mss.