Is this a fragment?

Status
Not open for further replies.

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,159
Location
The right earlobe of North America
No. It's a complete sentence, noun-verb-objective prepositional phrase.

The question of whether or not it's a good sentence can only be answered in the context of the surrounding prose. But more important, you shouldn't worry about sentence fragments. In fiction, they are commonly used, by a lot of verrrrrrry fine writers, for verrrrrry sound reasons.

Just be conscious of what you're writing, and when and why you might want to use a sentence fragment.

And don't depend on your computer, which is far stupider than you can possibly aspire to be, to tell you what is "correct" and what is not.

And carry on.

caw
 

Maryn

I Tried
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
64,200
Reaction score
43,330
Location
Behind you!
It's a complete sentence, and lay is correct, assuming it's in past tense.

Maryn, who made herself a lay/lie chart long ago and refers to it often
 

Voyager

Ribbed for your pleasure.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
1,445
Reaction score
3,196
So if you're a liar, you used to be a layer, right?
 

Tish Davidson

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,626
Reaction score
110
It's a complete sentence, and lay is correct, assuming it's in past tense.

Maryn, who made herself a lay/lie chart long ago and refers to it often


Maryn, maybe you could post your chart, since the lay/lie question seems to come up about once a week.
 

ResearchGuy

Resident Curmudgeon
Requiescat In Pace
Registered
Joined
Mar 26, 2005
Messages
5,011
Reaction score
697
Location
Sacramento area, CA
Website
www.umbachconsulting.com
Word says this sentence is a fragment. . .
If you know enough to avoid the mistakes made by grammar checkers, you do not need a grammar checker. They can be hilarious, but dangerous.

In the case you cited, for example, the grammar checker was wrong.

Many years ago, a grammar checker (Word's, probably) flagged a purported mismatch between subject and verb in a sentence like this, about my home town, Redlands, California:

"Redlands is east of San Bernardino."

Yep. It thought that "Redlands" was plural. (One Redland, many Redlands. Redlands are east of San Bernardino.) Stupid grammar checker. I long ago disabled that feature on my PC. It is useful only for flagging overly long sentences. But proofreading with a view to overly long sentences does as well or better.

--Ken
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,159
Location
The right earlobe of North America
I long ago disabled that feature on my PC. It is useful only for flagging overly long sentences. But proofreading with a view to overly long sentences does as well or better.

I leave my grammar checker on, probably mainly due to laziness. Once in a while, in rough draft work, it flags some stupidity on my part, so, okay. Other than that I just ignore it. I do the same with my spell-checker. In (veryveryvery minor) defense of MS-Word programmers, I suspect that's the main way they expect it to be used, as a tool, not as a Bible.

caw
 
Status
Not open for further replies.