Credits
WSB said:
Hey everyone! I'm fairly new here, been lurking for a couple of weeks and enjoying the discussions.

I'm working on my first novel (which may end up being a trilogy, we'll see), and have a question for you all.
I've had a few non-fiction articles published in ezines and one print mag, and of course in my own weekly newsletter. But I have no fiction credits whatsoever. (Just never had the courage or desire to submit short stories for publication.)
Will this hold me back when submitting my novel? Or should I whip up the effort to have some fiction published before submitting my novel? Does it really matter? I've heard SO many stories of authors who've never been published and it didn't hold them back.
What do you think?
Wendy
It really isn't so much that having no credits will harm you, it's just that having good credits can help you in a couple of ways. The first way is that if you've sold short stories to top magazines that are in the same field as your novel, you'll almost certainly have your novel manuscript read by someone higher up the food chain. Good credits can move a novel manuscript past first readers and assistant editors and into the hands of someone who can actually make a decision about it. This can be important.
Good credits tell an agent or editor you can write well enough to be paid good money for your writing, and also tell them you may well be bringing along something of a fan base who may well buy your novel.
I've beat out other writers twice with book deals because I had credits and they didn't. I sold my first novel over some good contenders because I had matching short story credits and they didn't. The editor liked all our novels, but because I had credits, which might bring some readers along, and the other writers didn't, she chose to buy my novel for the one slot she had open.
I had the same thing happen in the mystery field. The editor told my agent that my list of short story sales in the mystery field was the deciding factor in filling one of her slots with my novel, instead of with a novel by another writer who had no credits.
My agent, and a sister agency, choose almost all their new clients from the pool of writers with good credits who submit queries and manuscripts to them. Why wouldn't they? At most, they can take on only three to five new writers in a given year, and sometimes only one or two writers. They receive queries from seventy-five to a hundred writers with decent credits, and there's only enough time to read and evaluate so many manuscripts in a year, and they almost always find more good writers than they can handle in this pool.
This in no way means writers without credits can't get a novel published. It happens many times each and every year. But good credits are a real advantage in several ways. They will open some doors, they will move you past first readers, and all things being equal, they can be the deciding factor.
Especially when submitting queries instead of manuscripts. For the most part, one query reads pretty much like every other query, and no one can tell how well you write fiction from reading a query letter. A list of credits in a query letter, however, can tell an agent or editor that you write well enough to be paid for what you do.
But many writers don't like writing short stories, many good novelists write lousy short stories, and when this is the case it's better, I think, to concentrate on writing a really good novel. In the end, it's the writing that matters most.