No Country for Old Men - Western Murder Funstravaganza! SPOILERS!!

Spiny Norman

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
687
Reaction score
88
Location
Austin, Texas
Website
shufflingandmuttering.blogspot.com
The opening scenes of the Coen's new effot really set the tone.

It begins with shots of the Texas landscape, a country beautiful and heartless. The hills roll away into the horizon as the sun mercilessly beats down. Later, when violence marks every turn of the country we see, it'll be hard to be surprised. It's like violence belongs there. As one character says, "This country is hard on folks."

As this almost alien world flicks before us, we hear Tommy Lee Jones's Sheriff Bell speak of evil, and of one young, remorseless killer he had to put away because "if they let him out, he said he'd just go and do it again." To be a sheriff or to be any person of moral purpose, he says, one would have to put one's soul at hazard. At some point in time, he says, "you just have to say, 'All right. I'll be a part of this world.'"

And as he speaks we see a deputy leading a man into the back of a squad car. The man is dressed casually. His face is hidden in shadow and darkness and he moves mechanically, with either too much thought or no thought at all. The deputy climbs into the front seat and drives away.

Later, once we understand (or perhaps witness is the word) the thing sitting in the back of the car, we wonder how the deputy could even touch it. If he even knew what he was carrying. If he knew what was looking out at him behind those eyes.

The deputy returns to the station and phones in his arrest. In the background, his form blurry, sits the strange man. As the deputy speaks the man rises, dips down, and suddenly his handcuffed wrists are before him. The deputy ends his speech with the phrase, "Yes, sir. I've got it under control," which is when the man behind him reaches down and uses his handcuffs to garrotte the deputy, heaving him back, their boots making savage rubber arcs across the linoleum, and we zoom in from above on the killer's face, twisted in sick, blind fury and exhilaration, as he strangles the life out of a human being. As the deputy dies, the killer exhales. He looks satisfied. It is not sexual. It is just something that has been done and done well.

Meet Anton Chigurh, played by Javier Bardem not as a man, but rather as a force of nature in the world Sheriff Ed Tom Bell has agreed to be a part of.

The Coen's movie fundamentally is a chase movie set in a semi noir-western universe filled with dilapidated hotels and wide, empty stretches of country. The plot centers on three men - one, the salt-of-the-earth survivalist Llewelyn Moss (Josh Brolin), who while antelope hunting finds a drug deal gone savagely wrong and 2.4 million dollars sitting next to a corpse under a tree - the monster the drug kingpins have hired to get the money back, Anton Chigurh, whose nihlistic, existentialist, and harrowingly pragmatic method of living embraces murdering everything in his path - and Sheriff Bell, an old man who remembers simpler times and cannot understand what has come to the country he knows so well. It's fitting that the movie is set in 1980, just as the drug industry was firing up. Just imagine all the worse things that have happened since then.

Moss, of course, takes the money and runs. It's returning later to give water to one of the dying men at the shoot out that gets him in the sights of Chigurh, and as Chigurh mercilessly pursues him Sheriff Bell is left cleaning up after him and tagging the bodies.

I can honestly say that this movie is one of the greatest experiences I've ever had in the cinema. The Coens have masterfully crafted an almost Biblical thriller and cat-and-mouse game as hard men do hard things in a hard country. The movie has no music, but so fantastically arranged is each scene that you won't notice until the very end. Their eye for detail - the ring of a phone in the distance when there should be a man at the desk, but isn't, and why? - the flicker of thunder far on the horizon - the sound of a lightbulb being unscrewed outside a hotel room - these and more are deliciously wicked treats from masters of a craft. Their recent work has been fairly lackluster, but this takes them back to their works like Fargo, Miller's Crossing, and Blood Simple.

The movie is adapated from famed literary author Cormac McCarthy's novel, and adapted well - much of the novel is just dialogue to begin with. But the treatment of the country and the themes of fading morality are as scrupulously attended to as the way Tommy Lee Jones speaks his lines.

It also crackles with black humor. Moss's exchanges with his wife Carla Jean (the always gorgeous Kelly Macdonald) have the genuine charm and humor of a well-established couple. Bell's wry observations, while funny, mask a deep sorrow. And Chigurh's interactions with others evoke much nervous laughter. If you have ever wondered how a monster would interact with chicken farmers and beehive-laden women, here's your opportunity.

The acting is superb. Jones plays the role he was born to play. Is there a man more Texan? I can't think of one. Brolin is a revelation - his role is mostly silent, but somehow he imbues the simplest actions with knowledge and care. But it's Bardem, who is almost a sex-icon in Spain, who brings us a killer more frightening than Hannibal Lecter - whereas Lecter was a showy virtuoso, Anton Chigurh is an implacable force, as human as a thunderstorm, as thoughtful as a machine. His favorite tool is a pneumatic airgun made for slaughtering cattle, but he prefers to use it on people and door locks. His tool has meaning - not only is it the tool of a humble worker, it also implies that he views his fellow men as cattle. If they could be called "fellow men."

The movie is gripping and is unconventional for its scope - some climactic decisions are left off-screen, possibly for the viewer to imagine, possibly because they don't matter, an idea uncomfortable for most casual moviewatchers. The ending is sure to bring fire, but it's fitting. It is also abrupt. When Tommy Lee Jones starts talking about dreams, listen to what he's saying. Don't miss it or you'll miss one of the simpelst philosophical reflections on the events in the movie.

The movie is also violent. But it isn't graceful, Matrix-like violence, nor is it the immature torture porn of Saw - this violence is quick, gritty, disturbing, and featureless. It's both explosive and casual. In the world of No Country, such things are commonplace.

This movie is worth seeing in the theater for the ambient sound alone. The queer whisper of Chigurh's silenced shotgun (you heard me) has much more menace leaking out of the speakers behind your ears than it does from your TV. And the landscape, which may be even a bigger character than anyone else in the movie, deserves to be on the biggest silver screen available.
 
Last edited:

RLB

bundled
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Messages
1,158
Reaction score
558
Location
crisscrossing lake michigan
Loved this movie. That monologue at the beginning totally got me, and the rest of the movie didn't disappoint. IMO, this is their best yet.

ETA: I liked your summary. Were you looking for a critique or a discussion about the movie?
 

SHBueche

What happened to my LIFE?!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 5, 2006
Messages
1,117
Reaction score
71
Website
www.ShelleyBueche.com
Spiny Norman, You are from Austin? Me, too! I'll bet you saw this movie at the Alamo Drafthouse. Anyway, this movie is great, everyone should see it.
 

III

rockin the suburbs
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
4,672
Reaction score
3,567
Location
Spurs Country
Website
www.jayyoungweb.com
AAAARRRGGH! I skipped the OP because it looked long enough to contain spoilers. I can't wait to see this movie but it isn't showing in San Antonio yet and I ain't driving up to Austin. Glad to hear others like it though.
 

sunna

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 14, 2007
Messages
2,436
Reaction score
4,114
Going to see it Friday, and very much looking forward to it.
 

Spiny Norman

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
687
Reaction score
88
Location
Austin, Texas
Website
shufflingandmuttering.blogspot.com
AAAARRRGGH! I skipped the OP because it looked long enough to contain spoilers. I can't wait to see this movie but it isn't showing in San Antonio yet and I ain't driving up to Austin. Glad to hear others like it though.

No, I pretty much only describe about the first 5 minutes of the movie. It is very good.

Spiny Norman, You are from Austin? Me, too! I'll bet you saw this movie at the Alamo Drafthouse. Anyway, this movie is great, everyone should see it.

I tried to, but it was sold out. At 10 PM on a Sunday. Sheesh.

I saw it at the midnight showing at Great Hills. I thought I was going to be along throughout the whole movie until about 30 people showed up at 11:55.
 

LaceWing

Banned
Flounced
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
2,212
Reaction score
272
Location
all over the map
Spiney, thanks to your review I will be getting the book soon, very soon. Allergies make theaters a miserable experience, but I will eventually get the DVD for the movie. Thanks. Excellent writing.

(However, "nihilistic, existentialist and pragmatic" is a confusing conjunction. It seems to be rather philosophically overheated. Just sayin' in case you want to publish this review somewhere.)
 

Maryn

I Tried
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
64,134
Reaction score
43,125
Location
Behind you!
I saw it in Washington, D.C. when we visited a couple of weekends back. Loved it.

Also, much admiration for your review. Give my best to Zilker Park.

Maryn, former Austinite
 

III

rockin the suburbs
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
4,672
Reaction score
3,567
Location
Spurs Country
Website
www.jayyoungweb.com
***** SPOILER ALERT ******

Okay, I saw the movie last night and it was just awesome. Classic Coen brothers. Your synopsis was fantastic, Spiny!

But I have to ask - what the heck was up with that ending??? Did the Coen brothers watch the series finale of the Sopranos and say "Wow! That's great! We should do a great movie with no ending and go straight to the credits and leave the audience wondering if the movie is really over!" I didn't find the ending artsy or insightful - particularly since the movie didn't shy away from gratuity in any way. I wish they had ended the movie with Anton walking out of the house after killing Llewelyn's wife. His car crash added nothing to the story. We already knew he was impervious to pain, and he gets away, so I thought it was just gratuitous.

I also didn't like the fact that they didn't show the scene where Llewelyn was killed. It was so central to the movie and they cut it entirely. Was it just to make us wonder if Llewelyn was really alive? If so, it just added to the disappointment of the ending. It was like the Coens wrote 2 hours of a perfect movie then said "Hey, let's muck up the last section just to break out of the mold and make it memorable."

Anyway, it was a fantastic movie right up to the end. I'll probably watch it again on DVD and just skip the last three scenes.
 

Spiny Norman

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
687
Reaction score
88
Location
Austin, Texas
Website
shufflingandmuttering.blogspot.com
Yep, III, your complaints are pretty major ones, and a lot of people have had them. However, it's exactly how it's done in the book.

For Moss's death scene, the fact that we never even saw it implies that it wasn't important - which, in a way, it wasn't. As soon as Moss took the money, he doomed himself. To try and struggle against evil (or against human savagery, perhaps, because the world the movie and book paints is one that lacks any real moral compass) is ultimately pointless. It doesn't even matter how you die. As Chigurh said, "You know how this is going to end." And he even knew where the money would be. Chigurh, in a way, embodied fate - violent, blank, and thoughtless.

The ending was the same way in the book. It is very abrupt in the movie. The imagery is what was important - Bell dreamed of his father going ahead in dark, old times, up in the mountains, going ahead to light a fire and make the way clear. The idea of a father and a guiding, natural force is immediately going to summon up a lot of ideas about God. The question at the end is whether Bell still has hope that his father or the world as a whole is willing to provide hope or a light at the end of the road.

The ending isn't optimistic. As he says, "Then I woke up."

Maybe he woke up to the real world. Things are not going to get better.

Then there's just darkness and the sound of a ticking clock.
 

maestrowork

Fear the Death Ray
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
43,746
Reaction score
8,654
Location
Los Angeles
Website
www.amazon.com
A lot of people are not happy with the ending. But it's a great film nonetheless. It may very well win the Coen brothers their Oscars and also Best Picture (I'm still rooting for Atonement, though. ;) )
 

maestrowork

Fear the Death Ray
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
43,746
Reaction score
8,654
Location
Los Angeles
Website
www.amazon.com
Well... DGA just signed a contract and is ending their strike. I can see the writers' strike over pretty soon, so I think Oscars will be on... it's too big an event to risk the wrath. It's like canceling the Super Bowl.
 

eldragon

in a van down by the river
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Messages
5,095
Reaction score
912
Location
Mississippi
Website
lifeat42.blogspot.com
We just watched this last night.

I agree with III completely. This is why I detest reading or watching fiction. That ending is ridiculous.

It makes you wonder if Llewelyn was still alive, if he had survived. Where was the money? Why and when was the mother-n-law killed? Who were the Mexicans killed at the final motel, and who were the ones who sped off?

Just annoying.

Anyway, I expected the good guy to win, which was impossible with this fil.

I liked the evil guy better in Sea Inside. That's more along my lines.
 

Spiny Norman

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
687
Reaction score
88
Location
Austin, Texas
Website
shufflingandmuttering.blogspot.com
You guys really need to see it again. It meshes perfectly with the movie when you're expecting it. You really don't like it the first time if you know it's not coming because you expect the movie to follow a conventional format with its plot - good guy wins, bad guy dies, we all go home happy, we're given a revelatory climax that makes themes and purposes clear, etc, etc...

It's not like that. The bad guy wins because the world doesn't care. There's no natural force ingrained in the world making sure things turn out okay for you, personally.

This movie doesn't make it easy for you, no, but life doesn't either. Justice isn't a force like gravity or energy. It's something we made up to keep ourselves sane.

EDIT: Llewelyn did not survive. He's was killed by the buyers of the deal, the Mexicans, who learned of his location from the grandmother. We see a close up of his face on the motel floor. That's another "injustice" the movie does to the viewer - you want some big shootout with the main villain, but the "good guy" gets killed by some grunt-level nobody yeyos who are crappy as hell at it.

The grandmother was never killed, she died of cancer - remember how she said "I got the cancer"?

To be fair, if you didn't like the ending in the movie you probably wouldn't have liked it in the book, either. The translation was almost exact. It slowed things down before the sheriff's speech even more.
 
Last edited:

maestrowork

Fear the Death Ray
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
43,746
Reaction score
8,654
Location
Los Angeles
Website
www.amazon.com
You guys really need to see it again. It meshes perfectly with the movie when you're expecting it. You really don't like it the first time if you know it's not coming because you expect the movie to follow a conventional format with its plot - good guy wins, bad guy dies, we all go home happy, we're given a revelatory climax that makes themes and purposes clear, etc, etc...

Actually, I don't expect good winning over evil, and I do understand what the story is trying to say. I'm not one who demands a conventional storytelling.

What I object to is that when you invest so much time into a story, you naturally need to root for something, or someone. The ending seems to want to dispute that, and say, hey, not every story needs to achieve that -- there's a bigger theme here, that this world IS ugly. There is no happy ending. I get that, but again, when you invest so much into these characters and the story, you want to have at least a satisfying ending even if it's not a happy ending. Who are you supposed to root for, and for what reason? And when it doesn't happen, how are you supposed to feel? We talk about that a lot in the Novel Writing forum. There has to be a payoff at the end, whatever it is -- and if the pay off is what we already know (the world is an ugly place and sometimes the bad guy wins), then that really isn't quite a payoff, is it? If the ending is more thematic, a lot of people are going to have a problem with it.

It's not to say it's a bad film. It's very good. But such endings are always risky. If you don't like it, you're deemed "stupid" and if you do like it, you're deemed "pretentious." It seems.
 
Last edited:

Will Lavender

Everything is what it seems.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
1,801
Reaction score
355
Location
Louisville, KY
I assume the ending comes from the novel. I don't know for sure; haven't read McCarthy's book. But the ending reminded me a whole lot of The Road's.

Maybe somebody mentioned it in this thread, but the theme of "If you do something bad, you're going to get repaid" is pretty obvious. In other words: There's a balance in the universe; don't upset it. That seems to be what the coin flips are about, and what the MC's death is about. He sleeps with the woman in the motel (presumably), and he gets paid back by being murdered. Same with the villain: he unnecessarily goes to the wife's house to kill her, and then gets smashed in the car accident.

Tremendous film. Reminded me of Fargo in the desert, with that black humor running through everything. I saw it a month ago and have thought about it many times since.
 

Spiny Norman

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
687
Reaction score
88
Location
Austin, Texas
Website
shufflingandmuttering.blogspot.com
I felt quite a bit of payoff during Tommy Lee Jones's speech. But that was because I knew to pay attention when he spoke. A lot of people didn't - if I hadn't read the book and known the speech I would have never guessed we were seconds away from the ending. It may not, even if you listened. I couldn't say. People vary, it may just not be for you. That stark world is something I was familiar with, though. It spoke to me.

That intense desire for goodness, for balance... It's almost haunting, the way he describes it.

I don't believe Llewelyn slept with the girl. For one, he didn't in the book, but also he was fully dressed in the same clothes and the girl was still out by the pool when we next saw him. (Dead.)

I'm also not so sure that it was about balance, though. The discussion with the old man at the end repeated the themes - about how violence has always been here, and most are powerless to resist it. The old sheriff gunned down on his porch back at the turn of the century, it was the same thing that was happening now. There was that, and this inexorable idea of fate - choice doesn't seem to hold up against whatever blind machinations drive this world forwards. Once he took that money, he and everyone else he knew was dead.
 
Last edited:

eldragon

in a van down by the river
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Messages
5,095
Reaction score
912
Location
Mississippi
Website
lifeat42.blogspot.com
We're going to read the book and watch the movie again.

It's only the final moments that are confusing.

You aren't really told that the Mexicans kill the MC, you just see the truck driving away from the motel crime scene.

But then you see, when Tommy Lee Jones goes back that night, that the Anton guy had been there, because the keyhole had been blasted out, and the money had been removed from the presumed hidden place, in the AC grate.

Why were the other Mexicans dead in a hotel room?

Why would you think that the girls mother died of cancer, just because she had cancer? We assume she dies fairly quickly, like within a day or so, no?

And the next thing you know, the MC's wife is coming home from her funeral, and Anton is there, waiting for her. What took him so long?

I just think that, after spending two hours on the edge of my seat, it would be nice to have seen the shoot-out that killed the MC, and to have been sure of the little details.
 

eldragon

in a van down by the river
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Messages
5,095
Reaction score
912
Location
Mississippi
Website
lifeat42.blogspot.com
Again, this is why I do not like fiction.

I spend the rest of the week discussing this with my husband, and seeking answers, and drawing conclusions, and trying to fill in the holes in the plot.

In real-life, there aren't usually so many holes. Things always make some kind of sense to me.
 

maestrowork

Fear the Death Ray
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
43,746
Reaction score
8,654
Location
Los Angeles
Website
www.amazon.com
A lot of people didn't - if I hadn't read the book and known the speech I would have never guessed we were seconds away from the ending....

I don't believe Llewelyn slept with the girl. For one, he didn't in the book...

You shouldn't have to read the book to understand the movie, though. Even if they don't lay it out for you and hit you with a 2x4, the information should still be there -- all the clues and pertinent information. And if you need to watch it three times to get all of that, then I think it becomes too clever for its own good.
 

Will Lavender

Everything is what it seems.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
1,801
Reaction score
355
Location
Louisville, KY
There was that, and this inexorable idea of fate - choice doesn't seem to hold up against whatever blind machinations drive this world forwards. Once he took that money, he and everyone else he knew was dead.

But he chose to take the money. Just as he chose to not give the hurt Mexican in the truck water. When he went back that night, that's when all hell broke loose. Find water for him right away and Anton, the movie's devil-figure (or perhaps god-figure), doesn't come after him. Or -- and this is more likely -- choose not to take the money and none of it happens.

Fate is the residue of choice. It's not this autonomous thing that just occurs. Anton chose to flip the coin. He chose to return to the wife, and was punished. Llewelyn decided to follow the money. And I think he chose to sleep with the girl, or at least to follow her to her hotel room for those "drinks."
 
Last edited:

maestrowork

Fear the Death Ray
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
43,746
Reaction score
8,654
Location
Los Angeles
Website
www.amazon.com
Again, this is why I do not like fiction.

Huh? What does it have to do with fiction? There is all kinds of fiction. Why based your opinion on one movie? Also, do you watch other movies and like them? They are mostly fiction, you know.