POV?

Status
Not open for further replies.

write2livelive2write

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 30, 2007
Messages
62
Reaction score
2
This may sound a little stupid, but do you think a novel has to start with the protagonist's POV? Or if not, it's still best to be that way?
 

J. R. Tomlin

Banned
Joined
Aug 29, 2007
Messages
598
Reaction score
64
Location
Oregon
I don't think there's some rule that you have to. Your novel doesn't have to be in the protag's PoV at all. But if it is going to be it a reader will probably be happier if they know right away (or at least very soon) that this is the case. I don't think readers generally like spending a lot of time figuring out who the protag is or who the main PoV character is. But that's just my opinion.
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2005
Messages
47,985
Reaction score
13,247
I once wrote the first few chapters of a book from a secondary character's POV as the MC wasn't introduced until later in the book. I wanted to deliberately mislead the reader into thinking this character was important when in actual fact no, it's the other one who takes centre-stage for the main body of the book.
 

J. R. Tomlin

Banned
Joined
Aug 29, 2007
Messages
598
Reaction score
64
Location
Oregon
I'm not sure how I would react to that, scarlet. I have a feeling at that point I'd be annoyed and put the book down.

At the least, deliberately deceiving the reader is risky.
 

dpaterso

Also in our Discord and IRC chat channels
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
18,805
Reaction score
4,600
Location
Caledonia
Website
derekpaterson.net
Setting a story up with a prologue chapter or a sequence of teaser scenes is pretty much standard technique. Anything longer... hmm... I don't think I'd mind too much, but it all depends whether the stuff that's come before the protag's appearance is both essential and interesting.

-Derek
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2005
Messages
47,985
Reaction score
13,247
I'm not sure how I would react to that, scarlet. I have a feeling at that point I'd be annoyed and put the book down.

At the least, deliberately deceiving the reader is risky.

This 'misleading' character had a purpose though - she was the reason the MC met her love interest. It was because of her they got together, so she did have an important part to play, although she faded from the book by chapter five or six.
 

Gillhoughly

Grumpy writer and editor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
5,363
Reaction score
1,763
Location
Getting blitzed at Gillhoughly's Reef, Haleakaloha
It's always worked for me. I'm not fond of bait and switch as a reader or an editor.

Related issue: I once began a novel with the characters in the midst of the sub-plot and some idiot reviewer didn't get that.

The more textured and darker main story sailed through his brain-dead skull without docking. He condemned my plot concerning (insert side-issue here) as being "thin." (THAT was the comedy relief, y'gormless moron!)

Some people don't know they've been born.
 

ChaosTitan

Around
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 8, 2005
Messages
15,463
Reaction score
2,886
Location
The not-so-distant future
Website
kellymeding.com
IBut if it is going to be it a reader will probably be happier if they know right away (or at least very soon) that this is the case.

I think it depends on the story (and obviously on the reader, but that's sort of a given). Most people can tell just from reading the back cover blurb who the main character of the novel is going to be. If you're expecting Jane, and the first chapter is about Jack, it won't be terribly surprising if Jack dies violently at the end of chapter one.

Conversely, if the back blurb is more vague, or if it's an ensemble novel, it's harder to tell. Take Stephen King's Desperation as an example. The first chapter is the POV of a character named Peter Jackson. It's a long chapter. We see the action and rising dread through his eyes, we learn things about Peter and his wife, Mary. We experience the horror of the crazy sheriff through Peter's eyes.

SPOILER


Right up to the point where the sheriff pulls out his gun and kills Peter. It's a shocking moment, because I've been lead to believe Peter is an important character. But it fits perfectly with the novel, the tone, and the genre. It was a teriffic bait-n-switch, because it left me knowing no one was safe in this book.

It won't work with all books or all genres, but it does work. And work well. :)
 

Pthom

Word butcher
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
7,013
Reaction score
1,208
Location
Oregon
Originally, I began my novel (an ensemble piece) with a long-ish chapter, split into three scenes, each from the POV of what would be, later in the story, secondary characters. I used this device to introduce the world in which the story takes place, since it is one that has almost no similarities with the experiences of most readers. I introduced the main character in chapter two.

Only one beta reader "got it." Everyone else was disappointed that the initial character wasn't featured until several chapters later. They had identified with him, and not with the main character. And some found it was impossible to accept the main character ever, and therefore didn't like the story at all.
 

waylander

Who's going for a beer?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2005
Messages
9,771
Reaction score
2,473
Age
67
Location
London, UK
This may sound a little stupid, but do you think a novel has to start with the protagonist's POV? Or if not, it's still best to be that way?

Mine doesn't. My agent has no problem with it, nor did the many agents/editors and critiquers who have read it or, at least, the opening chapters
 

arodriguez

Renegade
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 25, 2005
Messages
229
Reaction score
64
Location
florida
Originally, I began my novel (an ensemble piece) with a long-ish chapter, split into three scenes, each from the POV of what would be, later in the story, secondary characters. I used this device to introduce the world in which the story takes place, since it is one that has almost no similarities with the experiences of most readers. I introduced the main character in chapter two.

Only one beta reader "got it." Everyone else was disappointed that the initial character wasn't featured until several chapters later. They had identified with him, and not with the main character. And some found it was impossible to accept the main character ever, and therefore didn't like the story at all.


That sounds harsh. I remember feeling similar dissappointment reading the Wild Cards series. Some of the heroes by various authors i wasn't crazy about, but i kept reading hoping i could get glimpses of the ones i did. Same way in Wheel of Time. How many instances are there of non-essential, protagonists with hardly any relation to the main plot? We still read because overall we want to "get" the whole thing.
i like reading different POV's
 

DeleyanLee

Writing Anarchist
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 6, 2007
Messages
31,667
Reaction score
11,425
Location
lost among the words
This may sound a little stupid, but do you think a novel has to start with the protagonist's POV? Or if not, it's still best to be that way?

No, I don't think it HAS to start with the hero's POV or even with the hero in the scene. The reader automatically starts the story looking for two things: the hero and good story questions to keep them reading. If you're not giving them the hero or any hint of who that is, the story questions really have to capture them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.