"Ads provided by Google and not endorsed by AW"

Status
Not open for further replies.

gp101

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
246
Location
New England
Still not good enough.

I'm sorry, and I'm not.

I love AW. I appreciate everyone's cooperation and especially the dedication of the Mods. And I certainly understand someone wanting to make a buck... I sure as hell do.

But allowing an advertisement endorsing LuLu as your banner (regardless if it's provided by Google or not) when there are so many rants against self-pubbing is troubling. Even hypocritical. Please don't take this as a jab against the wonderful folk who run AW, I really appreciate you all, Jenna et al. But isn't there another sponsor more worthy? Dictionary.com or B&N or Amazon or something?

Consider all the first-timers that come here. They may see the ad and despite the disclaimer, may reason that if a writer's site features this ad, it may be the way to go. And self-pub may indeed be the way to go for some, but as a whole, we all know that it can be a wasteland for beginners with big dreams, little patience, and an unwillingness to go about things through proper channels, whether they've tried those channels and failed or whether they see this as a shortcut.

Think about how that first-timer will feel after clicking on that ad, forking over the dough, then finding all the anti-selfpub threads here. Confusion will be the least of their feelings. They may feel betrayed or even duped.

This may or may not be the apporpriate thread for this subject, but OFFICE PARTY or TIO just don't get the same attention that this one does (thanks in large part to the wonderful and selfless work of UJ, no doubt). But since we come to this particular thread to find out different aspects RE: novel writing, I thought it was more than appropriate to post my concern.

Hoping I don't get banned,

Respectfully,

gp
 

poetinahat

Numbers are beautiful
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
21,856
Reaction score
10,453
It's plenty good enough, gp, and here's why.

Who is ranting against self-publishing?

I believe what people rant against is shonky practice among agents and publishers -- or people who try to sell self-publishing as though it were traditional.

Self-publication is a viable option for people with certain goals.

AW doesn't choose the Google ads that appear; Google does. I believe we have some ability to screen out inappropriate ads, but there's nothing wrong, per se, with self-publishing. It's just that it is not the same animal as traditional publishing, and people who sell it to you as though it is the same are not doing right by you.

I hope that clears things up.

Best wishes,

piah.

ETA: Moved this to the FAQ forum.
 
Last edited:

amber_grosjean

AW Addict
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 25, 2007
Messages
455
Reaction score
38
Location
Alexandria, Indiana
Website
www.amberrigbygrosjean.blogspot.com
Being the free forum it is, I don't think AW has a way of choosing what ads are placed on here. If that was the case, I'm sure there would be ads that led us to the right places that would help us all grow as writers without mattering what level we were all on. I do agree that it sucks seeing those ads at the top of the screen but there isn't much anyone could do about that, I don't think. The only thing we can do is ignore them unless you happen to see one that brings merit.

I don't think you would be kicked out of here for saying what you thought. We all have our rights to out opinions here which does make this site nice having around lol.

Amber
 

Inky

Eat, Sleep, Write...
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
10,637
Reaction score
5,063
Location
Aging. Writing. Aging. Writing...
It's plenty good enough, gp, and here's why.

Who is ranting against self-publishing?

I believe what people rant against is shonky practice among agents and publishers -- or people who try to sell self-publishing as though it were traditional.

Self-publication is a viable option for people with certain goals.

AW doesn't choose the Google ads that appear; Google does. I believe we have some ability to screen out inappropriate ads, but there's nothing wrong, per se, with self-publishing. It's just that it is not the same animal as traditional publishing, and people who sell it to you as though it is the same are not doing right by you.

I hope that clears things up.

Best wishes,

piah.

ETA: Moved this to the FAQ forum.
Dearest Poet,
You and I have joked numerous times in the past on the more silly threads, so I was quite moved to see this post by you. Though not directed towards me personally, I am deeply grateful for your words. I've had a few stingers throw nasty jabs my way over my decision to self publish without first taking the time to find out my reasons--namely choosing to call me lazy and in search of short cuts.
Yeah, okay.
I'm glad that you were able to eloquently point out that not all self publishing is a disease, though it must be entered into with eyes wide open and MUCH, MUCH, MUCH research.

As for the banners placed by Google. Okay, my take on this: AW relies solely (jeeze, did I spell that right?) on donations. Hell, even on my own web page, I've been tempted to go ahead and allow Google to place a banner of ads. Sometimes, via AW, I'll see an intersting Google Ad pertaining to writing. But if I click into it, at that point, I'm my own brain. AW doesn't think for me, whether they endorse the site or not. Just like any other page I browse, I draw my own conclusions. As for LuLu, there's a mod here that placed his work with that company and rather enjoyed the results. Now, it wasn't work he was looking to make any real money off of, nor become world famous. But, because of the type project it was, LuLu was the best choice. For others, LuLu's type of self publishing is great for family reunion cookbooks, and a host of other publications that are for personal use, not just the traditional way we look at 'being published'.

I've never used LuLu, but I did click on their website just to check things out back when said mod published his own work there. I thought it was kinda cool for the beginner to have a place where they could see a potential of what their book would look like one day, and for little to no charge. Sometimes, that can be a huge incentive in a world full of rejections to keep writing, to keep researching, to keep creating, to go forward.

I respect the fear that banners might send the wrong message, but like every other site via the internet these days, anyone clicking on a banner pretty much knows they enter at their own discretion.

And, unless some gazillionaire comes along and drops a check to Mac with a disgusting amount of zeroes at its end (to which I will personally offer a lap dance--hey! You really thought I wasn't going to squeeze in ONE debauched comment? Pfff!), I think AW, though they try to weed through the bad and ugly, must take their coins where they can find them to keep this site up and running.

kb
 

Deleted member 42

But allowing an advertisement endorsing LuLu as your banner (regardless if it's provided by Google or not) when there are so many rants against self-pubbing is troubling. Even hypocritical. Please don't take this as a jab against the wonderful folk who run AW, I really appreciate you all, Jenna et al. But isn't there another sponsor more worthy? Dictionary.com or B&N or Amazon or something?

Err . . . there's no policy against self-publishing, just a distinction between vanity publishing, scams related to publishing, and knowledgeably self-publishing.

Look, the AW sponsored book to raise funds for Katrina was published via Lulu.

Lulu is a reputable company.

Secondly, yes, the warning is quite enough.

Thirdly, MacAllister, with the help of mods and members does keep an eye on the ads to weed out those that aren't suitable, but it's not really possible, in terms of time or technology, to really do that. Already Google has complained that AW isn't serving enough of the ads offered.

Finally, it's pretty expensive to run the Water Cooler. Every bit of cash helps and the ads do generate some.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

benbradley

It's a doggy dog world
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
20,321
Reaction score
3,513
Location
Transcending Canines
...
ETA: Moved this to the FAQ forum.

And here's another thing, I can SEE (since I saw the thread title after it got moved) that it's in the FAQ forum, but there's no record (that we mortals can see, but I'm sure this place keeps Records Of Everything) of where it came FROM. Not that it much matters, but I always wonder where the OP thought the thread originally belonged.

Please feel free to use this post to start a new thread in the Whine Forum...:tongue

ETA: Okay, rereading the OP's rant and connecting the dots, it looks like this particular thread was started in Novel Writing...<Emily Litella voice>Never Mind...</>

...but my general rant still stands!
 
Last edited:

Inky

Eat, Sleep, Write...
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
10,637
Reaction score
5,063
Location
Aging. Writing. Aging. Writing...
And here's another thing, I can SEE (since I saw the thread title after it got moved) that it's in the FAQ forum, but there's no record (that we mortals can see, but I'm sure this place keeps Records Of Everything) of where it came FROM. Not that it much matters, but I always wonder where the OP thought the thread originally belonged.

Please feel free to use this post to start a new thread in the Whine Forum...:tongue

ETA: Okay, rereading the OP's rant and connecting the dots, it looks like this particular thread was started in Novel Writing...<Emily Litella voice>Never Mind...</>

...but my general rant still stands!
Please move this rant to the Flamming Banana Pit.

Hush, Ben. I'm practicing my mod skills.
Hey! It could happen!
 

veinglory

volitare nequeo
Self-Ban
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
28,750
Reaction score
2,937
Location
right here
Website
www.veinglory.com
IMHO there is nothing at all wrong with Lulu. They are an honest and reasonably upfront business. And there is nothing wrong with an informed writer choosing to self-publish, which is why we have a subforum about it.
 

Mustang Jim

Registered
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
7
Reaction score
6
Location
Hills of North Georgia
Two cents worth from a newbie

In Atlanta we have a talk show host by the name of Clark Howard. He is basically against self-publishing, but concludes that lulu is the best of the bunch.

He also speaks harshly about variable annuities and other investments he considers as scams. Then, when he takes a break, the radio station airs commercials for all sorts of things he has disparaged. He has no control over the stations in his network. It's up to the listener to decide who to believe.

The first time I signed on I noticed the disclaimer. That was enough for me. I'll take the ads with a grain of salt and put my faith in the people who post based on their personal experiences.
 

JennaGlatzer

wishes you happiness
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Messages
9,703
Reaction score
3,462
Website
www.jennaglatzer.com
Hi gp,

I'm probably just reiterating what others have said here, but I agree that there's nothing wrong with self-publishing in general, or Lulu in particular. We did choose Lulu to print Stories of Strength (our Hurricane Katrina fundraising project). It's all a matter of understanding what you can and can't expect from self- or vanity publishing, versus commercial publishing. Whether you'll be happy with it or not mostly depends on your goals and expectations. If you want to have your book seen in bookstores nationally, vanity POD presses are not the way to go. But there are other cases and reasons why self- and vanity publishing are fine choices (and perhaps the only choices), such as for a specialized book where you have a built-in audience, a poetry chapbook, a book you're writing just for your family and friends, a family history book, etc.

Mac blocks anyone we recognize as scammers from the Google ads, but Lulu is up-front about what they do, so there does come a point where people have to take responsibility for the choices they make and the amount of research they do. It's not hard to learn what Lulu does.
 

KTC

Stand in the Place Where You Live
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 24, 2005
Messages
29,138
Reaction score
8,564
Location
Toronto
Website
ktcraig.com
Lulu is the one place I refer people to if they wanna do it themselves.
 

wee

just a little
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
339
Reaction score
93
Wait, this rant is coming from someone whose signature says Take the Money & Run! ??

I'm sure that if you will make an appropriate-sized donation to AW, or if everyone was required to use the donation option before they could view or post here, then those ads could come down right away! As a former webmaster for several sites, I have a vague idea of what it costs to run a site. Particularly a site with as many users as this one.

Myself personally, every upstart writer who won't do her homework & runs off to PA is one more person not competing seriously with me. I know that sounds harsh & I would never intentionally send anyone in the wrong direction. But since I've been at AW, I've seen people get duped by the vanity presses, come here & find out better, then RUN back to another vanity press the instant they share their work & are told they need more practice. If that weren't bad enough, those same people come back to post gloats that say things like, "See? You were all wrong! I didn't need to make any changes! <<insert rip-off company name here>> told me I am a genius! So boo on you unpublished losers!" Meanwhile at Barnes & Noble their sales ranking is somewhere below #2,000,000,000,000,000.

Spend your time helping those who want to be helped. At some point in your life you'll realize you don't have as many pearls as you thought you did, and you'll quit casting them to swine, as it were. Those who want to be helped will do their research here, pick up a few pearls, and beat me out of a publishing contract. And Yay! for those who do so. I will celebrate with them.


wee
 
Last edited:

gp101

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
246
Location
New England
Wait, this rant is coming from someone whose signature says Take the Money & Run! ??

I'm sure that if you will make an appropriate-sized donation to AW, or if everyone was required to use the donation option before they could view or post here, then those ads could come down right away!

I did donate. I would love to do so again before the holidays but I don't know if that will be possible.



My apologies to those I offended with my post. The reason I originally posted my rant comes from me nearly falling for a less than honest POD that I was convinced would help realize my publishing dreams. I stopped midway thru the process about a week after first discovering AW and other sites and reading about the pitfalls of self-pubbing if your intent was to have that self-pubbed book "noticed" or "picked up" by publishing companies or agents. (IN GENERAL: it won't be properly edited, it probably isn't ready, little or no promotion, etc) I felt saved.

My only concern was for people who--like me back then--didn't know any better about how the publishing machine works, and that forking money over to POD would not necessarily help me to get that particular story published by a Publishing company.

Those who already know what they're getting into and still decide that POD is right for them have every reason to pursue that avenue and I do not look down my nose at them. They've already weighed the pros and cons and have made an educated decision that's good for them. It's the people--again, like me back then--who think this might be a quicker way of doing things that I thought might be disappointed. Or not. Yes, I was impatient back then and not willing to do everything I could. AW has helped me navigate a different course. My post was concerning people with the impatience and unwillingness to go through the publishing process, and who are otherwise unaware of how getting published by a publishing company really works--the same traits I had. It was not meant as an attack on those of you who use POD, but know what you're doing.

Again, I regret that I've offended some here. Was not my intention. I'll retreat to my cave and avoid future rants against ads here.

As for Take the money and Run! sig, that's my response toward advances, in general. It's not my motto on how to live life or run a business. Sorry if it made for some confusing or hypocritical appearances. Though I can see how someone would see that. And I certainly don't expect those who run AW to avoid making money. I just had a concern about one particular ad. Concern has been addressed. Perhaps I was making too much of it.



ETA: when I nearly went the POD route, my writing was considerably worse than it is now, only I didn't know it at the time. It's improved--I think--since then. But in those days I was convinced that agents had other reasons to reject me, and that it couldn't possibly be my writing. I know better now. But I was convinced that self-pubbing would generate enough interest in my work that I could then more easily get an agent. But I'm sure few if any people would have bought it. I'd been toiling in plays and screenplays, but my novel writing was that poor. It took lots of books and lots of hours at sites like this one for me to realize that and improve. So I was concerned a newbie in the same boat I was in may see that ad and figure right away that it was the only (or quickest) way to go before educating themselves and making certain that it was truly the best way to go. Someone who chooses that road after reading about the pros and cons of POD is not hurting themselves, and obviously is doing what's best for them. I'm sure they're getting what they want of it and use it to their benefit.
 
Last edited:

Rolling Thunder

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 12, 2006
Messages
15,209
Reaction score
5,342
Well, *I* wasn't offended (Yeah, I hear some of you saying pffffffft). But the ads change on a regular basis so I don't pay much attention to them.

Except the ones with hot babes in them. But...we don't see many of those. :(
 

Khazarkhum

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Messages
725
Reaction score
100
Well, *I* wasn't offended (Yeah, I hear some of you saying pffffffft). But the ads change on a regular basis so I don't pay much attention to them.

Except the ones with hot babes in them. But...we don't see many of those. :(

Wait...we get ads with hot babes in them?

Every time I've looked, all I see are ads for baby products! ;)
 

wee

just a little
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
339
Reaction score
93
My apologies to those I offended with my post. The reason I originally posted my rant comes from me nearly falling for a less than honest POD that I was convinced would help realize my publishing dreams. I stopped midway thru the process about a week after first discovering AW and other sites and reading about the pitfalls of self-pubbing if your intent was to have that self-pubbed book "noticed" or "picked up" by publishing companies or agents. (IN GENERAL: it won't be properly edited, it probably isn't ready, little or no promotion, etc) I felt saved.


I wasn't offended, and my post was strongly worded but partly tongue-in-cheek. I just wanted to make the point that you can stand on street corners with a bullhorn, but you can't save people from themselves. The same people who don't research the writing industry before getting jumping in with both feet ... probably also invest in oil wells that never get drilled & always lose their warranty cards. Help those who want help & don't sweat it past that.

Also, thank your lucky stars you were wise enough to keep doing research & to pull out when the light dawned.

wee
 

gp101

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
246
Location
New England
I wasn't offended, and my post was strongly worded but partly tongue-in-cheek. I just wanted to make the point that you can stand on street corners with a bullhorn, but you can't save people from themselves. The same people who don't research the writing industry before getting jumping in with both feet ... probably also invest in oil wells that never get drilled & always lose their warranty cards. Help those who want help & don't sweat it past that.

Also, thank your lucky stars you were wise enough to keep doing research & to pull out when the light dawned.

wee

Point taken and I agree. But some folk may be real greenhorns when they arrive here and may not know any better to research things before diving into a commitment. Most of us, I'm sure, have had "the vapors" where we thought we knew it all because we hadn't seen anything that offered a differevt POV or a view of the Big Picture. Usually the vapors come the second we write THE END after our first novel... at least, that was my experience. I am grateful that I didn't go the POD route ONLY because it would not have led me to my desired goal. And I would've been out a few hundred bucks. If my goal had been different, it would have been the perfect choice.

And I am very thankful that most of you see that I probably was a bit too flustered, and a bit heavy-handed in my initial post, but I did not mean to attack AW or the people who successfully use POD. I'm very thankful I don't have to feel like the village idiot that walks thru town with my head down, torch in-hand, while everyone else in town turns the other way and says, "Oh, God, it's him again. How do we get him out?"

I like this town too much.

Cheers.

gp
 
Status
Not open for further replies.