Did WWII Rifles have silencers?

Bravo

Socialitest
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
5,336
Reaction score
1,446
i'm talking sniper rifles. did they have silencers on them back then?

and does anyone know how far they'd be accurate for?
 

Haggis

Evil, undead Chihuahua
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
56,228
Reaction score
18,316
Location
A dark, evil place.
I take it back. Linky.

The Germans also fielded a muzzle mounted suppressor for their Mauser 98 sniper rifles, which was quite effective at hiding the source of the shot without interfering with velocity or accuracy.
 
Last edited:

dclary

Unabashed Mercenary
Poetry Book Collaborator
Requiescat In Pace
Registered
Joined
Oct 17, 2005
Messages
13,050
Reaction score
3,526
Age
57
Website
www.trumpstump2016.com
Most sniper rifles don't have silencers. It would affect the range and accuracy of the shot, I'd think.



600 yards effective range on the M1903-A4 (army standard issue sniper rifle in WWII)-- this was the sniper rifle of WWII AND Korea.

Marine Corps used the M1903-A1, with a better optical scope (8x compared to the army's 2.5x). But because of poor ammo quality, still just an effective range of 600 yards.


Neither had silencers.


this was the real reason why snipers were taught 1-shot-1-kill... you can't triangulate a single gunshot.
 

ALG71

Defanged Hellraiser
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
356
Reaction score
80
Location
In a place, at a time, where I sometimes ask mysel
I don't believe so. I've never seen anything about snipers having silencers back then on any History Channel programs. And Band of Brothers (which is on right now on History Channel) doesn't show anyone from the 101st using them at that time, even though, they don't really show any of the company being real snipers. I know it's a dramatized version of WWII but Spielberg and Co. went through a ton of things to make sure they were precise right down to the very emblems and medals of the time on both sides. If you look on IMDB, the FAQ's about the show really show just how much they went through to make the miniseries as true to life as possible on the technical side.
 

JB_Finesse

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 30, 2007
Messages
113
Reaction score
5
They were able to hide the flash, but that was it.

The closest thing to a "silenced sniper rifle" of that era would be the British De Lisle Carbine, which fired .45 ACP pistol ammunition (dismally short range) and usually didn't have a scope.

Even now, there aren't too many silenced sniper rifles, and all need to be used at shorter range due to the drop in velocity.
 
Last edited:

CoriSCapnSkip

New kid, be gentle!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
1,260
Reaction score
78
The TV Guide once ran an article on things on TV that are silly, and said silencers only work on very small guns, and that it was silly to show even a good-sized handgun going off with only a small sound. On old Westerns, I've seen pillows used to muffle the sound of a small gun. Don't know how well it would work in real life. Sounds like a job for "Mythbusters."
 

Bmwhtly

Yes, I'm back.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
6,965
Reaction score
3,051
Location
The unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of
The closest thing to a "silenced sniper rifle" of that era would be the British De Lisle Carbine
Nuts.

That's what I was going to say :)

But the DeLisle wasn't, by any means, a sniper's rifle. Given the size of the silencer, it was intended more for commandos.
And it was only accurate up to about 300 yards, if memory serves.
 

johnrobison

A Free Range Aspergian
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Messages
695
Reaction score
149
Location
Amherst, Massachusetts
Website
www.johnrobison.com
High powered rifles do not use silencers because the bullet travels at supersonic speed and makes a distinct "crack" Silencing the shot would not silence the bullet's passage through air. The article referenced earlier in the thread refers to flash supressors, which hide the source of shots at night. They have no effect on sound.
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,313
Silencers

Silencers were available for pretty much all weapons, but no silencer can stop the sound of the bullet breaking the sound barrier because the shock wave travels right along behind the bullet.

All a silencer really does is give the compressed gas a bigger area to expand, and therefore muffles the sound of the explosion. But the bullet itself makes one heck of a crack as it breaks the sound barrier, so while a silencer helps, it's really only effective if the bullet is slower than the speed of sound. This means very limited range, and very little power.

Generally speaking, a silencer just isn't needed or wanted on a sniper rifle. Range and accuracy are more important, and you're probably firing from several hundred yards.

But a good silencer really has little effect on range or accuracy, and can help hide the source of the shot. The main reason silencers weren't used often was simply because they're big, cumbersome, and even with a silencer, a sniper doesn't stick around for long.
 

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,767
Reaction score
4,663
Location
Scotland
Plus, I suspect it was a short trip to the nearest wall if one was caught in possession of a silencer for a rifle.
 

Tiger

AKA: "Gums of Steel"
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 18, 2005
Messages
1,879
Reaction score
487
Location
Honolulu
Silencers were available for pretty much all weapons, but no silencer can stop the sound of the bullet breaking the sound barrier because the shock wave travels right along behind the bullet.

All a silencer really does is give the compressed gas a bigger area to expand, and therefore muffles the sound of the explosion. But the bullet itself makes one heck of a crack as it breaks the sound barrier, so while a silencer helps, it's really only effective if the bullet is slower than the speed of sound. This means very limited range, and very little power.

Generally speaking, a silencer just isn't needed or wanted on a sniper rifle. Range and accuracy are more important, and you're probably firing from several hundred yards.

But a good silencer really has little effect on range or accuracy, and can help hide the source of the shot. The main reason silencers weren't used often was simply because they're big, cumbersome, and even with a silencer, a sniper doesn't stick around for long.

Yah... The thing's not much good unless the bullet is subsonic.
 

lharbaugh

It may not matter, depending on what your goal is. With a long-range shot, the bullet will arrive anywhere from 1-5 seconds before the sound. Considering reaction times and so forth, a good sniper with a bolt action can probably get off two or even three shots before the targets react.
 

JimmyB27

Hoopy frood
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 29, 2005
Messages
5,623
Reaction score
925
Age
44
Location
In the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable e
Website
destinydeceived.wordpress.com
High powered rifles do not use silencers because the bullet travels at supersonic speed and makes a distinct "crack" Silencing the shot would not silence the bullet's passage through air. The article referenced earlier in the thread refers to flash supressors, which hide the source of shots at night. They have no effect on sound.
I heard from a guy in the RAF Regiment that it's impossible to completely hide the muzzle flash of a rifle, and that the point of a flash surpressor is, in fact, to hide it from the shooter, thus preserving their night vision.
 

Poohcat

Registered
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
34
Reaction score
5
Location
Godsown In the great Antipodean pardise lost in th
WW2 rifles did not have silences but pistols and sub machines did. Both sides used them for special operations.
The SOE developed a silent Sten gun and several pistols of various calibres and in both automatic and revolver types.

These were issued to SAS, LRDG, SIS, SOE, Resistance services in all theatres. The Germans,Russians and US all used silenced weapons for agents (mainly assassins and special operations.

"Who dares Wins", "SOE", and other titles are good references. The Imperial War museum and the MI5/MI6 historians will be able to give you assistance. Also the Public Information Office of the CIA the successor to US wartime agency will help as well.

Couldn't say about the new KGB though!
 

tallus83

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 24, 2007
Messages
274
Reaction score
52
Location
NW Indiana
From Wikipedia:

During WW2, the Commando units of the British military requested a silenced rifle for eliminating sentries, guard dogs, and other clandestine operational uses.

The resulting weapon, designed by W.G. De Lisle, was effectively a Lee-Enfield SMLE Mk III rifle receiver redesigned to take a .45 ACP cartridge and associated magazine, with the barrel shortened and replaced with an integral silencer.
 

Sean D. Schaffer

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Messages
4,026
Reaction score
1,433
Someone on here mentioned The History Channel. I recall on a History Channel show called 'Wild West Tech' that the original silencer was invented in the late nineteenth century, or in the early twentieth, and it was quite some time before WWII.

Whether snipers had them in WWII or not, I couldn't say.