- Joined
- Aug 1, 2006
- Messages
- 10,881
- Reaction score
- 5,368
*Please NOTE:
The conversations going on in this thread will and do contain spoilers as we dissect the movie.
I just got done watching the movie and I am hoping it was a book. It was brilliant.
About three quarters of the way through I figured out how the murderer got away with it but I wasn't completely sure. Half of the fun was wondering if I was right or wrong.
Now for me, that is a good plot, story and the characters were excellent.
Thursday night we had a discussion in the chatroom for MTS and jst said something that has been on my mind. He said that I might find it easier to write if I have the solution of the crime and then work backwards.
I kept thinking while watching the movie that it would be interesting to know if that is how the author wrote this one.
What do you think, is it easier to figure out the end of the story and work backwards for a MTS story?
The conversations going on in this thread will and do contain spoilers as we dissect the movie.
I just got done watching the movie and I am hoping it was a book. It was brilliant.
About three quarters of the way through I figured out how the murderer got away with it but I wasn't completely sure. Half of the fun was wondering if I was right or wrong.
Now for me, that is a good plot, story and the characters were excellent.
Thursday night we had a discussion in the chatroom for MTS and jst said something that has been on my mind. He said that I might find it easier to write if I have the solution of the crime and then work backwards.
I kept thinking while watching the movie that it would be interesting to know if that is how the author wrote this one.
What do you think, is it easier to figure out the end of the story and work backwards for a MTS story?
Last edited: