Why does Stephen King get so little attention for writing the short-story/novella that was made into what many consider to be one of the greatest films of the last 50 years? Very few people even know that the movie was heavily based on 'Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption', and (most frustrating of all to me) the 'literary critics' who have a field day ripping into King's horror work conveniently forget to mention it as well.
It's just curious to me that while everyone and their uncle knows that Jurassic Park spawned forth from the mental loins of Crichton, only a precious handful of the public knows the true origins of a far more critically celebrated movie. Even the so-called 'literary elite' are damned sure reluctant to even mention 'Shawshank Redemption' in their assessments of King's overall writing ability and ability as a storyteller.
-BS
PS I think I mentioned my distaste for this situation in a previous post months and months ago, but, at 5:45 AM...it's hard to remember. @_@
It's just curious to me that while everyone and their uncle knows that Jurassic Park spawned forth from the mental loins of Crichton, only a precious handful of the public knows the true origins of a far more critically celebrated movie. Even the so-called 'literary elite' are damned sure reluctant to even mention 'Shawshank Redemption' in their assessments of King's overall writing ability and ability as a storyteller.
-BS
PS I think I mentioned my distaste for this situation in a previous post months and months ago, but, at 5:45 AM...it's hard to remember. @_@
Last edited:
