A problem with commas

Status
Not open for further replies.

RLSMiller

Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
210
Reaction score
35
Location
Herts, UK
Here's the sentence I'm having trouble with:

I’m a seventeen-year-old student and I've traveled extensively, including places like Malaysia, Singapore, France, and the USA, where I have relatives.

Does the above sentence read as if I have relatives in all the places I mentioned, or as if I have relatives in the USA (which is what I meant). I'm not sure if I should be using a semi-colon (e.g. "and the USA; where I have relatives.") or if it's fine as it is.

Thanks in advance for any replies.
 

Dawnstorm

punny user title, here
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 18, 2007
Messages
2,752
Reaction score
449
Location
Austria
Not to me.

But it's an interesting question.

A pretty firm "no" to the semicolon, the way you've used it. Semicolons are sometimes used in lists where the list items use commas, but that would make your sentence look like this:

I’m a seventeen-year-old student and I've traveled extensively, including places like Malaysia; Singapore; France; and the USA, where I have relatives.

I'd just rephrase that:

I’m a seventeen-year-old student and I've traveled extensively, including places like the USA, where I have relatives, Malaysia, Singapore, and France.

This does, however, take emphasis away from the USA, so you may not want to do this.
 

Duncan J Macdonald

Plotting! Not Plodding!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,882
Reaction score
455
Age
69
Location
Northern Virginia
Here's the sentence I'm having trouble with:

I’m a seventeen-year-old student and I've traveled extensively, including places like Malaysia, Singapore, France, and the USA, where I have relatives.

Does the above sentence read as if I have relatives in all the places I mentioned, or as if I have relatives in the USA (which is what I meant). I'm not sure if I should be using a semi-colon (e.g. "and the USA; where I have relatives.") or if it's fine as it is.

Thanks in advance for any replies.
You could go with a parethetical since the fact that you have relatives in the US is immaterial to your list of destinations.
I’m a seventeen-year-old student and I've traveled extensively, including places like Malaysia, Singapore, France, and the USA (where I have relatives).
 

RLB

bundled
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Messages
1,158
Reaction score
558
Location
crisscrossing lake michigan
Here's the sentence I'm having trouble with:

I’m a seventeen-year-old student and I've traveled extensively, including places like Malaysia, Singapore, France, and the USA, where I have relatives.

I'd also stick in a comma after "student" to separate the two independent clauses, though I've noticed a few people not doing this anymore. Has the rule changed?
 

maestrowork

Fear the Death Ray
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
43,746
Reaction score
8,654
Location
Los Angeles
Website
www.amazon.com
It reads fine to me. But if you're worried about clarity, maybe try using "as well as" instead:

I've traveled extensively, including places like Malaysia, Singapore, and France as well as the USA, where I have relatives.
 

Sandi LeFaucheur

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 26, 2006
Messages
823
Reaction score
142
Location
Orangeville, Canada
Website
www.sandilefaucheur.com
I think it needs a "to". (And I like Maestrowork's "as well as".) And I think you need to lose the comma after "extensively".

Howzabout:

I've traveled extensively to places like Malaysia, Singapore, and France, as well as to the USA, where I have relatives.
 

pconsidine

Too Adorkable for Words
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Messages
2,594
Reaction score
358
Location
Connecticut, USA
Website
www.pjcopy.com
I'd also stick in a comma after "student" to separate the two independent clauses, though I've noticed a few people not doing this anymore. Has the rule changed?
It has become more optional lately. I think it's been rolled into the "comma before and" rule. I've seen it omitted as a rule unless there are two or more items before the and. Of course, there does seem to be an age-appropriateness issue as well, since I still see it in materials that are being produced for primary-grade children (grades 1-3).

Edited to add: As to the original question, I would go with the parentheses. Or with the rewritten version, as suggested above.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.