Do You Sometimes Get Caught Up In Your "Characters"?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sunnyside

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
418
Reaction score
51
Location
New Mexico
Website
www.brianjayjones.com
As non-fiction writers--especially as biographers or historians--we know in advance how a story will proceed. We know how our subject lived and died, and we have their letters and papers so we have their "voice." We know as writers we have to be true to their lives. We know as we write their stories that our subjects have to stay "in character," as it were.

However...

One of the unexpected pleasures I had while writing my biography of Washington Irving was that nearly every chapter contained an encounter with another famous or prominent person: Charles Dickens. Martin Van Buren. Nathaniel Hawthorne. Mary Shelley. Sir Walter Scott. Queen Victoria. The list goes on and on -- Irving was a veritable Forrest Gump when it game to meeting famous people. And as I approached certain chapters in the book, I often found myself growing excited that in the coming chapter, I was finally going to get my hands on a certain "character." I was going to get to write not only Irving, but Van Buren, or Scott, or Shelley or Daniel Webster or Poe.

That may sound odd, because none of those people are "characters" per se -- they're all real people, with behaviors we can't change -- and yet, I found myself thrilled that I was going to get to maneuver this particular character through my story. To me, it was almost like writing an iconic character, like Sherlock Holmes or Batman -- you get to play around in their universe, following a pre-defined set of rules and expectations, yet you do get to leave your own mark. I found it oddly thrilling.

So, here's my question to my fellow non-fictionalists: Do you sometimes get caught up in the lives of your non-fictional characters to the point where they almost seem like characters in a novel? Fiction writers often talk about a particular character in their book delightedly "getting away from them" and taking on a life of their own. We don't quite have that luxury -- we can't, for example, put George Washington in an rocket, no matter how interesting it might make his story -- but I'm interested in hearing what the rest of you may have experienced when telling someone else's story.

I'll step over here now, and anxiously see what you all have to say. Have fun out there!
 

Lauri B

I Heart Mac
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
2,038
Reaction score
400
Absolutely-I'm currently working on a book about Theodore Roosevelt and an expedition he took with his son, Kermit, and I am experiencing very much the same thing. I feel very much a part of his time, too. That's much of what I love about researching history: the people that I learn about aren't necessarily famous in their own time, so I get the added benefit of being able to say, "Wow! This character knew that one at teh very start of his career. I bet they never would have imagined how influential or important this guy ended up."
 

SHBueche

What happened to my LIFE?!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 5, 2006
Messages
1,117
Reaction score
71
Website
www.ShelleyBueche.com
This is a great question, I agree with you and Nomad, 100%. Interesting and little known details about someone who is the subject of a book (whether or not they are well-known) can make for fascinating reading.
 

RMKeefe

Registered
Joined
Sep 2, 2007
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Location
Canada
Sunnyside, this is an excellent topic.

My response to the question is a definite YES. My current project deals with the life of New York gangster boss Big Jack Zelig, who doubled as a protector of and benefactor for the Lower East Side's Jewish quarter until his death in October 1912.

When you're doing a biography, you're essentially bringing someone to life. Like it or not, you have to take a literary walk in their shoes before you can do their story justice. They're with you... even when they're really not.

For me, the most profound experience during the research phase of my project was an interview I conducted with a 98 year old man who witnessed Zelig's 1912 murder. The interviewee was only six at the time of the event in question, but remembered it vividly. He told me what the day had been like weather-wise, described what Zelig was wearing, what transpired seconds after the assassin's gun went off, etc. This conversation was the Holy Grail. To most of us, an individual who died in 1912 can't be any more than a fading photograph or a subject we read about in a history book. My interview subject remembered a living, breathing (although not for long!) human being. Incredible!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.