Subject-Verb Agreement

Status
Not open for further replies.

Glenda

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 19, 2006
Messages
630
Reaction score
56
I had a problem with this until I came across this in a college book. Now I get it. A plural-noun subject will end in -s, but its verb will not. Between them, subject and verb use only one -s ending.

I couldn't get past if the noun was plural, the verb needed a -s, making it plural. :e2smack:

Now, "making it plural," would that be a nonrestrictive clause?
 

TheIT

Infuriatingly Theoretical
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
6,432
Reaction score
1,343
Location
Silicon Valley
Not sure of the terminology, i.e. nonrestrictive clause, but here are some examples which I need to think about whenever I have to choose the correct verb.

My rule of thumb is to chop off all clauses which modify the subject, then choose the verb. For example:

One of the teachers wants to talk with me. => ("One" wants, because "one" is singular)

Some of the teachers want to talk with me. => ("Some" want, because "some" is plural)

More than one of the teachers want to talk with me. => ("More than one" want, again plural because this is a group, and at this point I'm wondering what I've done so wrong that the teachers are beginning to gang up on me. ;) )

Does this help?
 

maestrowork

Fear the Death Ray
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
43,746
Reaction score
8,654
Location
Los Angeles
Website
www.amazon.com
To confuse matters further, what if you use a gerund?

Talking back to your parents makes you a bad child.

It's clear that the "noun" is the whole "talking back to your parents" thing which is singular, but sometimes people forget or they slip.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.