I've got a problem with leaps of time between scenes and I'm not quite sure if this is a smart thing to do. I'm not talking about gaps of hours or days. I'm talking many years too.
What I have is a story progress that begins with a setup of 10 scenes. These ten scenes have some time transition, as well. But the following 6 basically follow the MC as he grows up in a new life and ends at the age where he'll be at for the rest of the story, which I estimate is another 52 scenes.
My worry is that despite how big of a word count I could write each of these six scenes by, I have a feeling that in a seamless read, it would become confusing. I know that at the beginning of each scene, I would have to make it clear about the transition of time. But because there are gaps of only a few hours after a few of the scenes before a transition of a few years, the reader may forget and get confused in one of those new scenes. For example (from the illustrated scene map at the bottom of the post), the reader reads the fourth scene of the year of the high school graduation. It transition to a later that evening, which could be smooth for the reader. But in the following scene after, he is in his early twenties. This is an example of what I'm worried about. Too many great leaps in time.
I am not familiar with writing stuff like this where someone grows up. I consider each of these important developments to have a key to the story. My first amateur inclination was to write these so it would explain why his family is the way it is. I quickly moved away from that idea and thought of ways to incorporate the actual plot with set pieces and things to back up each solid moment where he is at in life for later story reinforcement.
Does length of the scene have impact as to the jarring effect of moving from one time then to another? Or is there another angle I'm completely missing about when it come to a character timeline. I really dislike the idea of missing the main character's earlier years and showing a dysfunctional family with no reason of it. Unless this is how I should be approaching it. The reason for the dislike is because the story doesn't start with him living in a dysfunctional family. So the reader can't accept the situation as is. The first ten scenes illustrate a different aspect of the main character's development. Or is the situation just fine so long as it is written good enough to engage the reader?
-deleted
What I have is a story progress that begins with a setup of 10 scenes. These ten scenes have some time transition, as well. But the following 6 basically follow the MC as he grows up in a new life and ends at the age where he'll be at for the rest of the story, which I estimate is another 52 scenes.
My worry is that despite how big of a word count I could write each of these six scenes by, I have a feeling that in a seamless read, it would become confusing. I know that at the beginning of each scene, I would have to make it clear about the transition of time. But because there are gaps of only a few hours after a few of the scenes before a transition of a few years, the reader may forget and get confused in one of those new scenes. For example (from the illustrated scene map at the bottom of the post), the reader reads the fourth scene of the year of the high school graduation. It transition to a later that evening, which could be smooth for the reader. But in the following scene after, he is in his early twenties. This is an example of what I'm worried about. Too many great leaps in time.
I am not familiar with writing stuff like this where someone grows up. I consider each of these important developments to have a key to the story. My first amateur inclination was to write these so it would explain why his family is the way it is. I quickly moved away from that idea and thought of ways to incorporate the actual plot with set pieces and things to back up each solid moment where he is at in life for later story reinforcement.
Does length of the scene have impact as to the jarring effect of moving from one time then to another? Or is there another angle I'm completely missing about when it come to a character timeline. I really dislike the idea of missing the main character's earlier years and showing a dysfunctional family with no reason of it. Unless this is how I should be approaching it. The reason for the dislike is because the story doesn't start with him living in a dysfunctional family. So the reader can't accept the situation as is. The first ten scenes illustrate a different aspect of the main character's development. Or is the situation just fine so long as it is written good enough to engage the reader?
-deleted
Last edited: